Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1583

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to drug use by and drug testing for applicants and recipients of unemployment compensation benefits; providing a criminal penalty.

Impact

If enacted, the law would establish strict conditions for eligibility for unemployment benefits, linked directly to drug use. By setting a framework for random drug testing, the bill seeks to deter substance abuse among the unemployed, thereby influencing the behavior of individuals who might otherwise exploit the system. The amendments would alter existing benefits structures and could create a chilling effect on applications for assistance from individuals who may be concerned about the implications of drug testing.

Summary

House Bill 1583 proposes significant amendments to the Texas Labor Code concerning drug use and drug testing for individuals applying for or receiving unemployment compensation benefits. The bill mandates that applicants and recipients submit to random drug tests, aimed at ensuring the integrity and proper use of unemployment benefits. Failure to comply with testing or a positive test result would disqualify individuals from receiving benefits until they have returned to the workforce for a stipulated period. Additionally, the bill introduces criminal penalties for those who falsely declare sobriety on their applications.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 1583 appears to be mixed, with proponents arguing that it is a necessary measure to maintain the integrity of the unemployment system. They contend that it ensures that benefits are available only to those truly in need and not misused by individuals abusing substances. Conversely, opponents raise ethical concerns about the fairness and privacy implications of such testing, arguing it unfairly targets vulnerable populations and may not effectively solve issues of unemployment or substance abuse.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's potential to disproportionately affect individuals with substance use disorders, who may require support rather than punitive measures. Critics emphasize that such policies may inhibit access to much-needed assistance, thereby exacerbating challenges for individuals in recovery or facing employment barriers. Furthermore, there are concerns about the efficacy of drug testing in addressing the root causes of unemployment, suggesting that a balance must be struck between accountability and support.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB277

Criminal procedure: search of persons.

CA AB937

Plastic products: commercial agricultural mulch film: labeling: soil biodegradable.

CA AB2632

Segregated confinement.

CA AB1464

Housing preferences.

MI SB0975

Employment security: benefits; disqualification from benefits; modify. Amends sec. 29 of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.29).

CA AB2564

Individual Shared Responsibility Penalty: waiver: health care service plans.

CA SB479

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just cause: natural person.

CA SB1428

Reproductive health: mifepristone and other medication.