Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1611

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the date by which certain entering students at public and private or independent institutions of higher education must receive a vaccination against bacterial meningitis.

Impact

The modifications introduced by HB 1611 are designed to improve public health outcomes by ensuring that students are vaccinated against bacterial meningitis before their initial enrollment in college. The alterations to the timing requirements for vaccinations could potentially increase vaccination rates and contribute to a safer campus environment. Institutions of higher education will have to adapt their administrative procedures to incorporate these changes, which may impact their health service operations and student enrollment processes.

Summary

House Bill 1611 focuses on the vaccination requirements for students entering public and private institutions of higher education in Texas, specifically against bacterial meningitis. The bill amends Section 51.9192(e) of the Education Code to mandate a more defined timeline for vaccination compliance. Students are required to receive the necessary vaccinations no later than 45 days before the semester begins unless an extension is granted by the institution. This change aims to enhance health safety measures among the student population and reduce the risk of meningitis outbreaks within educational institutions.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 1611 has been positive among public health advocates and educational institutions. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step toward protecting student health and maintaining public safety on campuses. They believe that the prescribed timeframe for vaccinations provides ample opportunity for compliance. Conversely, there may be some concerns among students and parents regarding potential burdens related to scheduling vaccinations and the implications of non-compliance.

Contention

While the bill is generally welcomed, notable points of contention have emerged concerning the enforcement and implications of compliance extensions. There is a concern that the criteria for granting extensions may vary widely between institutions, potentially leading to inconsistencies in vaccination statuses among students. Furthermore, discussions around access to vaccinations and the affordability of receiving them could arise, influencing the bill's overall effectiveness in achieving widespread compliance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.