Texas House Bill HB1817

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to authorizing a change in the fee for a hunter education course.

Impact

The amendments proposed by HB 1817 are aimed at updating the fee structures for hunter education courses, making them more flexible to accommodate administrative costs. By enabling independent instructors to set a portion of their fees according to this new structure, the bill seeks to ensure that the courses remain accessible while also generating revenue for the necessary administrative functions related to wildlife safety and education. This change is particularly significant as it represents a response to evolving operational needs in the realm of outdoor education and conservation efforts.

Summary

House Bill 1817 pertains to the authorization of a change in fees associated with hunter education courses in Texas. Specifically, the bill amends Section 62.014 of the Parks and Wildlife Code and introduces a new subsection that allows independent instructors, who are not employees of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, to charge a fee that includes an administrative cost set by the commission. This fee is capped at $15 and must be deposited into the game, fish, and water safety account, which is intended to support the management and conservation of wildlife resources in Texas.

Sentiment

Discussion around HB 1817 appears to be generally supportive, with stakeholders recognizing the necessity of updating fee structures to reflect current operational realities. Many proponents argue that the bill offers a balanced approach to fee management that benefitted both the instructors and the Department of Parks and Wildlife. The sentiment is largely positive as stakeholders view this bill as a pragmatic solution to improve the sustainability and effectiveness of hunter education programs, although some may express concerns about the potential for increased costs to students.

Contention

There does not appear to be significant contention surrounding HB 1817, as the adjustments seem to reflect a consensus on the need for improved financial mechanisms for hunter education. However, it is essential to monitor for any feedback from stakeholders across the hunting and conservation communities, especially regarding the implementation of the new fee structure and its impact on participant accessibility. The effectiveness of the administrative fee could also come into question as discussions progress on its potential impacts on course enrollment and instructor participation.