Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1842

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the selection of certain candidates for office through a unitary primary election.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1842 would amend the Texas Election Code and streamline the nomination process for state offices. The primary election would be conducted in conjunction with the existing primary election but would feature a single ballot for all candidates, outlining their party preference. This change is expected to encourage broader participation and could potentially lead to a shift in voter demographics, allowing independent candidates increased visibility and opportunities for success in future elections.

Summary

House Bill 1842 proposes a significant change to the way candidates for office are selected in Texas, introducing a unitary primary election system. This bill aims to streamline the election process by requiring all candidates for statewide offices and state legislative positions to appear on a single primary election ballot, rather than separate ballots for each political party. By doing so, the bill seeks to reduce voter confusion and increase participation in the electoral process by enabling all eligible voters to weigh in on candidates, regardless of their party affiliation at the time of voting.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1842 appears to be mixed among legislators and political stakeholders. Proponents, including certain reform-minded legislators, positively view the bill as a necessary step towards electoral reform that enhances voter engagement and simplifies the candidate selection process. On the other hand, critics express concerns that such a system may disadvantage minor political parties by diluting their presence on the ballot, leading to a diminished choice for voters who prefer candidates from less dominant parties.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the fear of potential bias against smaller political parties and independent candidates, as the structure of a unitary primary could favor larger, established parties with stronger organizational support. Further debate centers on whether the bill adequately addresses the complexities of candidate requirements and the potential necessities for logistical adjustments in election administration. Stakeholders worry that while the intention is to simplify, it could inadvertently complicate the election process for certain parties and lead to unforeseen challenges.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB4453

Relating to nonpartisan primary elections; authorizing a fee.

TX HB2873

Relating to nonpartisan primary elections; authorizing a fee.

TX HB3080

Relating to nonpartisan primary elections; authorizing a fee.

TX HB2506

Relating to nonpartisan primary elections; authorizing a fee.

TX HB1996

Relating to nonpartisan primary elections; authorizing a fee.

TX HB1204

Relating to nonpartisan primary elections; authorizing a fee.

AZ SB1255

Lieutenant governor; duties; ballot

CA AB152

COVID-19 relief: supplemental paid sick leave.