Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1853 House Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 29, 2013      TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1853 by Ratliff (Relating to a behavior improvement plan or a behavior intervention plan adopted for certain students with an individualized education program.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would to allow an admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee to determine if a behavior improvement plan or a behavior intervention plan is appropriate for a student with an individualized education program (IEP). If the ARD committee determined it was appropriate, the behavior improvement plan or behavior intervention plan would be incorporated into the student's IEP and provided to each of the student's teachers.  Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), required revisions to the model IEP could be accomplished with existing agency resources.  Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:701 Central Education Agency   LBB Staff:  UP, JBi, JSc    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 29, 2013





  TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1853 by Ratliff (Relating to a behavior improvement plan or a behavior intervention plan adopted for certain students with an individualized education program.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted  

TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1853 by Ratliff (Relating to a behavior improvement plan or a behavior intervention plan adopted for certain students with an individualized education program.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education 

 Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1853 by Ratliff (Relating to a behavior improvement plan or a behavior intervention plan adopted for certain students with an individualized education program.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

HB1853 by Ratliff (Relating to a behavior improvement plan or a behavior intervention plan adopted for certain students with an individualized education program.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would to allow an admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee to determine if a behavior improvement plan or a behavior intervention plan is appropriate for a student with an individualized education program (IEP). If the ARD committee determined it was appropriate, the behavior improvement plan or behavior intervention plan would be incorporated into the student's IEP and provided to each of the student's teachers.  Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), required revisions to the model IEP could be accomplished with existing agency resources. 

The bill would to allow an admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee to determine if a behavior improvement plan or a behavior intervention plan is appropriate for a student with an individualized education program (IEP). If the ARD committee determined it was appropriate, the behavior improvement plan or behavior intervention plan would be incorporated into the student's IEP and provided to each of the student's teachers. 

Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), required revisions to the model IEP could be accomplished with existing agency resources. 

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency

701 Central Education Agency

LBB Staff: UP, JBi, JSc

 UP, JBi, JSc