Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1861

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to service of process on certain public officials.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1861 would amend existing laws regarding how legal processes are served to public officials, including both state and local entities. This could lead to changes in the way legal notifications are managed and could simplify the process for litigants seeking to serve lawsuits or other legal documents to officials. The bill aims to clarify the process and provide a more straightforward mechanism for ensuring that public officials can be reached effectively, which is vital for the integrity of legal proceedings.

Summary

House Bill 1861 relates to the service of process on certain public officials in Texas. The bill proposes amendments to Chapter 30 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, specifically adding Section 30.022. This section outlines new procedures for serving legal documents to public officials, specifying accepted methods of delivery and requirements for proof of service. The intent behind this legislation appears to be streamlining the process of serving legal notices, which could potentially enhance the efficiency of legal proceedings involving government officials.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1861 is one of cautious support, particularly among legislators who recognize the need for efficient legal processes. While some members may appreciate the clarity and potential for expedited legal actions, there may also be concerns about the implications for public officials and the overall legal ecosystem. Opponents could argue that such changes may inadvertently affect the rights of individuals seeking to contest actions taken by government officials.

Contention

There may be points of contention regarding the specific procedures established in the bill, particularly how they balance the need for efficiency with the rights of individuals to ensure they have been properly notified of legal actions. For instance, the requirement for three separate attempts to serve an individual may lead to disputes about the effectiveness of the service. Additionally, there may be concerns about whether the changes could lead to increased complexity in cases where public officials are involved, thus impacting their ability to respond to legal actions in a timely manner.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.