Texas House Bill HB218

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

• Filed: 11/26/12

Caption

Relating to prohibiting the manufacture and sale of certain children's products containing bisphenol-A or certain other substances.

Impact

If enacted, HB 218 will amend the Health and Safety Code to specifically outlaw the use of bisphenol-A in children's products, as well as any chemicals identified as known or suspected carcinogens. The bill also specifically flags BPA in infant formula containers, although it includes a sunset clause allowing its manufacture until January 1, 2017. This change will ensure that products available in the Texas market for young children meet higher safety standards, potentially reducing the risk of chemical exposure that can lead to severe health issues.

Summary

House Bill 218 aims to improve children's safety by prohibiting the manufacture and sale of certain products containing bisphenol-A (BPA) and other hazardous substances. Specifically, this legislation targets products intended for children under three years of age, encompassing toys, cosmetics, jewelry, and other items designed for use by infants. By banning these substances, the bill seeks to minimize health risks associated with exposure to harmful chemicals that could disrupt normal development or cause long-term health consequences.

Sentiment

The response to HB 218 has generally been positive among child health advocates and the scientific community, who support the increased regulation of hazardous materials in consumer goods meant for children. However, industries involved in the production of these children's products have expressed some concern over the potential impact on their operations and the economic implications of switching to safer alternatives. Overall, there is a strong sentiment favoring child protection and safety in the discussions surrounding the bill.

Contention

While HB 218 represents a significant step towards safeguarding children's health, some points of contention have emerged, particularly regarding the deadlines for compliance and the economic effects on manufacturers. Critics argue that the transition to alternative materials may incur additional costs and logistical challenges for producers. Additionally, debates have surfaced around how the definitions of 'children's products' are structured and what specific chemicals should be included in the initial ban.