Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2308

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to facility reporting requirements for an abortion performed at an abortion facility.

Impact

Should this bill be enacted, it will significantly alter existing requirements regarding abortion reporting in Texas. The introduction of penalties for non-compliance further emphasizes the seriousness of these new obligations. For instance, physicians who fail to submit the required reports in a timely manner could face escalating financial penalties, starting at $1,000 and potentially increasing to as much as $5,000 for ongoing non-compliance. This could potentially impact the willingness of some providers to perform abortions due to the fear of punitive measures, thereby influencing access to these services in the state.

Summary

House Bill 2308 aims to enhance reporting requirements for physicians performing abortions at licensed abortion facilities in Texas. It mandates that physicians submit a monthly report detailing each abortion performed, using a specific form provided by the state health department. Importantly, the reports are required to maintain patient confidentiality by ensuring that no identifying information is included. This legislative move is positioned as a means to gather better data on abortion practices while purportedly ensuring greater oversight of such procedures.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2308 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill is necessary for increasing accountability and monitoring of abortion services, framing it as a move to protect the health and safety of women. On the other hand, critics suggest that the new reporting requirements could serve to further stigmatize abortion services and may be perceived as an additional barrier to access for patients seeking these critical health services. The concerns raised by opponents highlight deeper divisions in the ongoing abortion rights discourse.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions surrounding HB2308 include debates over patient privacy versus state oversight, as well as the implications of increased regulation on the availability of abortion services in Texas. The bill is likely to spark controversy, particularly among reproductive health advocates who view the enhanced reporting as another layer of control that could deter physicians from providing abortions. The discussion around this bill reflects broader ideological divides regarding reproductive rights, healthcare access, and the role of government in personal health decisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB702

Provides with respect to the practice of physician assistants

HI SB61

Relating To Associate Physicians.

HI SB61

Relating To Associate Physicians.

CO SB083

Physician Assistant Collaboration Requirements

CA AB1070

Physician assistants: physician supervision: exceptions.

LA SB115

Provides with respect to the practice of physician assistants. (gov sig)

NV AB170

Providing for the licensure of associate physicians and associate osteopathic physicians. (BDR 54-840)

LA SB166

Provides relative to physician assistants. (8/1/19)