Relating to the installation, maintenance, operation, and relocation of saltwater pipeline facilities.
The legislative intent behind HB2406 is to streamline the process by which saltwater pipeline operators can engage with local and state governments regarding their operations. By allowing local authorities to require relocation of pipelines at the operator's expense for public works or road expansions, the bill effectively prioritizes public infrastructure development while safeguarding operator interests where property interests are concerned. Additionally, by mandating a written notice period prior to any relocation requirement, it conveys a clear protocol for operators to follow and mitigate disruptions. This balance could foster smoother cooperation between the operators and municipal authorities.
House Bill 2406 introduces significant regulations concerning the installation, maintenance, operation, and relocation of saltwater pipeline facilities. Defined within the bill, 'saltwater pipeline facilities' are pipelines that transport water laden with salt and other substances from oil and gas operations. The bill seeks to set clear guidelines for saltwater pipeline operators regarding their operations along public rights-of-way, ensuring that such setups do not interfere with existing infrastructure and public works. It establishes requirements for obtaining leases and fair market value payments for right-of-way usage, aiming to balance the interests of saltwater pipeline operators with the rights of public entity governance.
HB2406 may encounter contention particularly from local governments and potentially from environmental advocacy groups concerned about the long-term implications of extensive pipeline infrastructure. Critics might argue that the relocation costs imposed solely on operators could lead to increased operational costs that may ultimately be passed on to consumers. Furthermore, there are concerns around the environmental assessments related to pipeline installations and relocations, as they have the potential to impact local ecosystems. The requirement that operators restore public roads post-installation is also a point of consideration, introducing a level of accountability but also potential pushback on what constitutes 'prompt restoration'.