Texas House Bill HB2669

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to a release of certain adult stem cell donor information by the Department of Public Safety.

Impact

The enactment of HB 2669 would modify existing regulations concerning donor privacy specific to adult stem cells. With the bill in place, individuals wishing to donate stem cells can have their information shared more readily, which aims to encourage donations by easing the process for banks and registries to contact potential donors. The provision that allows applicants to withdraw consent for information release reflects an acknowledgment of privacy concerns while still promoting potential medical advancements through stem cell research and donor facilitation.

Summary

House Bill 2669 focuses on the release of certain information related to adult stem cell donors by the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS). The bill permits DPS to offer applicants for driver's licenses or personal identification certificates the option to consent to the release of their name, address, and phone number to adult stem cell banks and registries. This initiative intends to facilitate adult stem cell donations by improving the connection between potential donors and the organizations that seek them, thereby potentially increasing the availability of stem cells for medical purposes.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 2669 appears largely positive among supporters who emphasize its potential to enhance medical research and patient outcomes through increased stem cell donations. However, there are concerns raised by privacy advocates regarding the implications of consent-based information sharing. Critics argue that the bill could compromise personal information if not managed properly, highlighting the need for stringent safeguards to protect donor identities while facilitating their contributions to medical science.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding HB 2669 involve the balance between promoting stem cell donation and maintaining donor privacy. Proponents argue that the benefits of having a more connected and responsive donation system outweigh the risks associated with personal information release. Conversely, opponents express apprehension about the legislative move toward transparency affecting individuals' privacy rights, urging for clear guidelines on how donor information will be used and protected. This ongoing debate underscores the need for careful considerations in the context of medical ethics and personal consent.