Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2769 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                            83R5303 SGA-F
 By: Rodriguez of Bexar H.B. No. 2769


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the process for appealing the desired future conditions
 adopted by a groundwater conservation district for an aquifer.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Section 36.1083, Water Code, is amended to read
 as follows:
 Sec. 36.1083.  ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OF DESIRED FUTURE
 CONDITIONS. (a) In this section:
 (1)  "Affected person" has the meaning assigned by
 Section 36.1082.
 (2)  "Development[, "development] board" means the
 Texas Water Development Board.
 (3)  "Office" means the State Office of Administrative
 Hearings.
 (b)  Not later than the 180th day after the date on which a
 district adopted a desired future condition under Section
 36.108(d-4), an affected person may file a petition with the
 district requesting that the district contract with the office to
 conduct a hearing to appeal the desired future condition, including
 the reasonableness of the desired future condition [A person with a
 legally defined interest in the groundwater in the management area,
 a district in or adjacent to the management area, or a regional
 water planning group for a region in the management area may file a
 petition with the development board appealing the approval of the
 desired future conditions of the groundwater resources established
 under this section.    The petition must provide evidence that the
 districts did not establish a reasonable desired future condition
 of the groundwater resources in the management area].
 (c)  Not later than the 45th day after receiving a petition
 under Subsection (b), the district shall:
 (1)  contract with the office;
 (2)  request a contested case hearing; and
 (3)  submit a copy of the petition to the office [The
 development board shall review the petition and any evidence
 relevant to the petition.    The development board shall hold at least
 one hearing at a central location in the management area to take
 testimony on the petition.    The development board may delegate
 responsibility for a hearing to the executive administrator or to a
 person designated by the executive administrator.    If the
 development board finds that the conditions require revision, the
 development board shall submit a report to the districts that
 includes a list of findings and recommended revisions to the
 desired future conditions of the groundwater resources].
 (d)  The hearing must be held at a location described by
 Section 36.403(c). The hearing shall be conducted in accordance
 with Chapter 2001, Government Code, and rules of the office [The
 districts shall prepare a revised plan in accordance with
 development board recommendations and hold, after notice, at least
 one public hearing at a central location in the management area.
 After consideration of all public and development board comments,
 the districts shall revise the conditions and submit the conditions
 to the development board for review].
 (e)  The district may adopt rules for notice and hearings
 conducted under this section that are consistent with the
 procedural rules of the office.  In the manner prescribed by
 district and office rules, the district shall provide general
 notice of the hearing and individual notice of the hearing to the
 petitioner, any other party in the hearing identified under
 Subsection (f)(3), each nonparty district and regional water
 planning group in the management area, the development board, and
 the commission.  Only an affected person may participate as a party
 in the hearing.
 (f)  The office shall hold a prehearing conference to
 determine preliminary matters including:
 (1)  whether the petition should be dismissed for
 failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted;
 (2)  whether a person is an affected person and
 eligible to participate as a party in the hearing; and
 (3)  naming parties to the hearing.
 (g)  The petitioner shall pay all costs associated with the
 contract for the hearing and shall deposit with the district an
 amount sufficient to pay the contract amount before the hearing
 begins.  At the conclusion of the hearing, the district shall refund
 any excess money to the petitioner.
 (h)  If the administrative law judge finds that a technical
 analysis is needed related to the hydrogeology of the area or
 matters within the development board's expertise, the judge may
 request a study from the development board.  In conducting the
 technical analysis, the development board shall consider any
 relevant information provided in the petition, as well as any
 groundwater availability models, published studies, or other
 information the development board considers relevant.  The study
 must be completed and delivered to the office not later than the
 120th day after the date of the request for admission into the
 evidentiary record for consideration at the hearing.  The
 development board shall make available the relevant staff as expert
 witnesses during the hearing if requested by any party or the
 administrative law judge.
 (i)  On receipt of the administrative law judge's findings of
 fact and conclusions of law in a proposal for decision, including a
 dismissal of a petition under Subsection (f), the district's board
 shall issue a final order stating the district's decision on the
 contested matter and the district's findings of fact and
 conclusions of law.  The board may change a finding of fact or
 conclusion of law made by the administrative law judge, or may
 vacate or modify an order issued by the administrative law judge in
 the same manner as a state agency under Section 2001.058(e),
 Government Code.  If the district in its final order finds that a
 desired future condition is unreasonable, the districts in the
 management area shall reconvene in a joint planning meeting not
 later than the 30th day after the date of the final order to revise
 the desired future condition.
 (j)  A district's final order finding that a desired future
 condition is unreasonable does not invalidate the desired future
 condition for a district not subject to the petition.
 SECTION 2.  Subchapter D, Chapter 36, Water Code, is amended
 by adding Section 36.10831 to read as follows:
 Sec. 36.10831.  COURT APPEAL OF DESIRED FUTURE CONDITION. A
 final district order under Section 36.1083 may be appealed to a
 court under the substantial evidence standard of review as provided
 by Section 2001.174, Government Code.  The venue for an appeal is a
 district court in Travis County.  If the court finds that a desired
 future condition is unreasonable, the court shall strike the
 desired future condition and order the districts in the management
 area to reconvene in a joint planning meeting not later than the
 30th day after the date of the court's decision to revise the
 desired future condition.
 SECTION 3.  (a)  A petition filed under Section 36.1083,
 Water Code, and pending on the effective date of this Act before the
 Texas Water Development Board to appeal the desired future
 condition adopted by a groundwater conservation district shall be
 handled by the Texas Water Development Board in compliance with
 Section 36.1083, Water Code, as that section existed before the
 effective date of this Act.
 (b)  Section 36.1083, Water Code, as amended by this Act,
 applies only to a petition filed on or after the effective date of
 this Act.
 SECTION 4.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2013.