Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3072

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the cost-effectiveness of the manner in which a school district chooses to collect the district's taxes.

Impact

If implemented, HB3072 could lead to adjustments in the funding received by school districts based on the efficiency of their tax collection methods. It introduces a mechanism for the commissioner to reduce or increase funding depending upon whether the costs incurred by a district for tax collection are higher or lower than those estimated for collection by the county authorities. This change aims to ensure a more judicious allocation of education funds, reinforcing the need for school districts to optimize their tax collection methods.

Summary

House Bill 3072 addresses the procedures and cost-effectiveness of tax collection by school districts in Texas. The bill mandates that school districts report on the financial management performance regarding tax collection, emphasizing a comparative analysis between the costs incurred when a school district collects its own taxes versus having them collected by the county assessor-collector. This requirement encourages transparency and allows for financial assessments that can improve the efficiency of tax collection processes for school funding.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB3072 appears to lean positively, with supporters arguing that it encourages better financial practices within school districts while ensuring that resources are allocated based on the effectiveness of tax collection. However, there may be concerns from districts that might face financial penalties if they cannot collect taxes in a cost-effective manner. Hence, the views on this bill highlight an understanding of necessary fiscal management balanced with apprehensions about potential funding impacts on less efficient districts.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the threshold for determining cost-effectiveness, as it may create disparities between districts that can afford to implement more efficient systems and those that cannot. Additionally, the potential for reduced funding for certain districts could lead to broader debates about education equity, as districts with less robust financial operations might struggle under this new evaluation system. The need for careful application and consideration of each district's circumstances is crucial for the successful enactment of the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MN SF4184

Local optional revenue modifications, unemployment costs and family paid medical leave in local optional revenue inclusion, referendum revenue simplification, equalization aid increase, and appropriating money

MN HF4117

Local optional revenue modified, revenue for unemployment costs and family paid medical leave included in local optional revenue, referendum revenue simplified, equalization aid increased, and money appropriated.

NJ A118

Requires school district's general fund tax levy account for at least 25 percent of school district's total general fund revenue; provides four-year phase-in.

NJ S3984

Requires five-year average of equalized property valuation be used in calculation of local share under State school funding formula.

NJ A5577

Requires five-year average of equalized property valuation be used in calculation of local share under State school funding formula.

NJ A942

Requires five-year average of equalized property valuation be used in calculation of local share under State school funding formula.

NJ S2071

Requires five-year average of equalized property valuation be used in calculation of local share under State school funding formula.

MN HF409

Local optional revenue increased, aid amount increased, and money appropriated.