Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3477

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the regulation of cosmetology, including eyebrow or facial hair threading.

Impact

The implementation of HB 3477 is expected to centralize and formalize the training and licensing processes associated with eyebrow and facial hair threading. This move is seen as beneficial for ensuring that practitioners are well-trained in sanitation, health, and safety methods—key areas that contribute to the overall well-being of clients. Moreover, the inclusion of an advisory board will allow for continued oversight and updating of the regulations as necessary, ensuring that they evolve with industry standards and practices. This can have long-term positive implications for customer safety and service quality in beauty establishments across the state.

Summary

House Bill 3477 focuses on the regulation of cosmetology in Texas, specifically addressing eyebrow and facial hair threading. The bill establishes new licensing requirements and sets up an advisory board dedicated to threading practices within the cosmetology field. Through this legislation, the Texas Commission of Licensing and Regulation is empowered to adopt rules that govern the education and specialties required for cosmetologists who wish to offer eyebrow threading services. Notably, the bill includes provisions for training programs that aspiring threading specialists must complete, which encompass both practical experience and theoretical instruction in health and safety practices related to the service.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 3477 appears to be generally supportive within the beauty industry. Many professionals agree that the bill will help to raise the standards of practice and protect public health by providing clear guidelines and training requirements for practitioners. However, there may also be concerns regarding overregulation and the potential burden this imposes on small business owners who might struggle to meet new compliance standards. Thus, while the bill is largely viewed as a step forward in standardizing cosmetology practices, there remains some apprehension about its implications for the industry’s autonomy.

Contention

Potential points of contention regarding HB 3477 include the balance between regulatory oversight and the operational freedom of small business cosmetologists. Some industry stakeholders fear that the requirements might disadvantage smaller beauty establishments that lack the resources to comply with extensive training and certification processes. Additionally, there are concerns about how these new rules will be enforced and whether they will lead to an influx of fees for licenses and continued education, which might ultimately affect service pricing and accessibility for consumers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2237

Children and youth: transfer of specialty mental health services.

HI HB15

Relating To Health.

HI SB326

Relating To Health.

CA AB2107

Clinical laboratory testing.

AR HB1835

Concerning Specialty Court Programs; And To Update And Clarify The Law Concerning Drug Court, Mental Health Court, Veterans Court, And Dwi/bwi Specialty Court Programs.

NJ A732

Requires Department of Agriculture and certain consulting agency partners to study and report on regulatory compliance cost obligations of specialty crop growers.

LA SB285

Provides for determination of unfunded accrued liability payments. (gov sig) (OR +$415,000,000 FC GF EX)

AR HB1144

To Create A Specialty Court Program For Families Involved In A Dependency-neglect Proceeding That Are Affected By Substance Use Disorders Or Mental Health Disorders.