Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB380

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to safety requirements applicable to gas pipelines in certain counties.

Impact

If passed, HB 380 would significantly amend existing state laws governing pipeline safety, particularly in densely populated areas. The bill introduces regulations that would require pipeline operators to maintain a minimum distance from occupied structures, ensuring a greater level of safety for residents living near such infrastructure. Furthermore, the requirement for automatic shutoff valves, enhanced monitoring, and corrosion protection would represent a bolster to the state's efforts in enforcing stricter safety standards, aimed at preventing leaks and accidents associated with gas pipelines.

Summary

House Bill 380 focuses on enhancing safety requirements for gas pipelines situated in populous counties of Texas. This bill specifically applies to gas pipelines located in areas defined as Class 3 or 4 locations under federal regulations and in counties with populations exceeding 1.8 million. The legislation aims to ensure that stringent safety measures are implemented in the construction and operation of these pipelines, particularly in regions where human occupancy and environmental concerns are prevalent. It establishes minimum distance requirements from permanent structures, mandates monitoring systems, and imposes integrity assessments for pipeline maintenance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 380 appears to be generally supportive among safety advocates and environmental groups, who view the bill as a necessary step to protect communities and the environment from potential hazards posed by gas pipelines. However, industry stakeholders may perceive these regulations as an additional burden, fearing increased costs and operational hurdles. This divide highlights the tension between public safety interests and industry concerns regarding regulation impact.

Contention

Notably, there may be points of contention regarding the bill's economic implications. While proponents argue that enhancing safety is paramount, opponents may raise concerns about the economic impact of complying with the new safety requirements. Discussions may also focus on the feasibility of enforcing such stringent measures and their potential effects on the energy sector's operational flexibility.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.