Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3803

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to a fidelity bond or insurance requirement for property owners' association and unit owners' association board members.

Impact

The bill's implementation is anticipated to strengthen the financial stability of property associations and instill greater trust within communities. By requiring fidelity coverage equating to at least three months' worth of aggregate assessments plus reserve funds, the law is designed to protect homeowners from financial discrepancies that could arise within the board. This could lead to a more responsible governance structure within associations, as the threat of losses stemming from dishonesty is mitigated. Consequently, this should encourage greater engagement and participation from the community members, knowing that their funds are safeguarded against potential fraudulent acts.

Summary

House Bill 3803 seeks to enhance the security and integrity of property owners' associations and unit owners' associations in Texas by mandating the procurement of fidelity bonds or insurance for their board members. Specifically, it requires that any board governing a unit owners' association with 20 or more units, as well as property owners' associations with 20 or more lots, obtain and maintain a fidelity bond or insurance that covers losses incurred from dishonest or fraudulent acts. This legislation aims to protect the funds that these boards manage on behalf of their associations, ensuring that all officers, directors, and employees involved in financial transactions are covered under this requirement.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as a positive move toward accountability in property associations, there could be points of contention surrounding its implementation. Some stakeholders might argue about the financial implications of the required fidelity bonds or insurance premiums, particularly for smaller associations that may be financially constrained. Additionally, there may be resistance from board members who perceive this mandate as an intrusion into the operational autonomy of these organizations. Discussions regarding the adequacy of coverage and compliance mechanisms may also arise post-implementation, as associations adjust to these new requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.