Texas House Bill HB563

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to shale transportation districts, authorizing the issuance of bonds.

Impact

The bill's passage could significantly impact state laws by creating a new governmental structure dedicated to managing and funding transportation projects specifically related to shale formations. It enables local counties to form districts and submit comprehensive plans for transportation needs, which could lead to improved roads and infrastructure that facilitate shale production and economic development. However, the bill requires local funding mechanisms to be utilized wherever possible, ensuring that local governments remain financially responsible.

Summary

House Bill 563 establishes shale transportation districts in Texas and provides for the issuance of bonds to finance road projects in these districts. The bill outlines the process for counties with portions of a shale formation to form a district, allowing them to coordinate and plan road construction, maintenance, and improvement projects. This legislation is aimed at enhancing the infrastructure related to shale transportation, which is vital to support the oil and gas industry in Texas.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 563 appears largely positive among supporters who believe it will greatly benefit local economies and the oil and gas industry by improving infrastructure. However, there may be some concerns about funding and governance, particularly regarding how local funding mechanisms will be implemented and the oversight of district operations. Feedback from various stakeholders, including local governments, could influence the overall perception of the bill as it evolves.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 563 include concerns about the governance structure of the shale transportation districts and the potential implications for local control. The bill establishes a board of directors comprised of representatives from the counties within the district, but there are apprehensions about whether this board can adequately represent local interests and manage resources effectively. Additionally, the necessity for state approval to form a district and the conditions for bond issuance could raise questions about state oversight versus local autonomy.