California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB625

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Report Pass
6/19/19  
Report Pass
6/19/19  
Refer
6/19/19  
Refer
6/19/19  
Refer
7/1/19  
Refer
7/1/19  
Report Pass
7/9/19  
Report Pass
7/9/19  
Refer
7/9/19  
Report Pass
8/21/19  
Report Pass
8/21/19  
Refer
5/26/20  
Refer
5/26/20  
Refer
5/26/20  
Refer
5/26/20  
Report Pass
6/1/20  
Report Pass
6/1/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Report Pass
6/4/20  
Report Pass
6/4/20  
Refer
6/18/20  

Caption

Central Basin Municipal Water District: receivership.

Impact

The immediate effect of SB625 is to ensure the stability and management of the CBMWD during its receivership, through which it will seek long-term governance solutions. By transferring control to the WRD, the bill seeks to protect the community's vital water supply and maintain operational continuity while preparing for a municipal service review. This review is to be conducted by the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of Los Angeles, focusing on governance alternatives to ensure accountability and effective oversight in the future.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 625, introduced by Senator Bradford, concerns the governance of the Central Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) in California. The bill aims to address significant governance issues within the CBMWD, which have been highlighted by a 2015 audit that revealed failures in leadership and oversight. The proposed legislation mandates the dissolution of the current board of directors and designates the Water Replenishment District of Southern California (WRD) as the receiver for CBMWD. Through this change, the WRD will acquire full authority to manage the district's assets and operations, aiming to restore accountability within the water district.

Sentiment

General sentiment towards SB625 leans toward support as it is seen as a necessary intervention aimed at addressing significant failures in management within the CBMWD. Proponents highlight the urgency of restoring public trust and effective governance related to the water supply. Conversely, there may be concerns regarding the removal of locally elected officials and potential implications for local governance. Nonetheless, the urgency clause embedded in the bill underscores the critical need to act quickly in safeguarding public health and resources.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the constitutional implications of removing the elected board and appointing a receiver. Some stakeholders express apprehension regarding the concentration of power in the WRD and the potential loss of local representation in decisions that directly affect water management. The bill explicitly states that its provisions will only be in effect for 18 months, highlighting that it is a temporary measure while long-term solutions are explored through public consultation and legislative review.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1577

California Safe Drinking Water Act: Sativa-Los Angeles County Water District.

CA AB1195

Limited Eligibility and Appointment Program: lists.

CA SB1124

Public health goal: primary drinking water standard: manganese.

CA AB913

Electrical corporations: wildfire and undercollection.

CA SB1414

Timber harvesting plans: San Jose Water Company.

CA SB1476

Water replenishment districts: contracts.

CA SB1194

Water replenishment districts: competitive bidding.