Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB586 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 15, 2013      TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB586 by Workman (Relating to the waiver of sovereign immunity for certain design and construction claims arising under written contracts with state agencies.), As Engrossed    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to waive sovereign immunity for the state related to a breach of contract for engineering, architectural, or construction services or for materials related to those professional services.  The Office of the Attorney General indicates that additional lawsuits could arise against the state upon enactment of the bill.  The OAG estimates that an additional 5.5 Assistant Attorney General and Legal Assistant positions would be required to address the increased workload. However, it is anticipated that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed within existing resources.  The Office of Court Administration indicates that any costs associated with the bill to the court system could be absorbed within existing resources. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:302 Office of the Attorney General, 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council   LBB Staff:  UP, AG, JM, CL, EP, JP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 15, 2013





  TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB586 by Workman (Relating to the waiver of sovereign immunity for certain design and construction claims arising under written contracts with state agencies.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB586 by Workman (Relating to the waiver of sovereign immunity for certain design and construction claims arising under written contracts with state agencies.), As Engrossed

 Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs 

 Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB586 by Workman (Relating to the waiver of sovereign immunity for certain design and construction claims arising under written contracts with state agencies.), As Engrossed

HB586 by Workman (Relating to the waiver of sovereign immunity for certain design and construction claims arising under written contracts with state agencies.), As Engrossed



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to waive sovereign immunity for the state related to a breach of contract for engineering, architectural, or construction services or for materials related to those professional services.  The Office of the Attorney General indicates that additional lawsuits could arise against the state upon enactment of the bill.  The OAG estimates that an additional 5.5 Assistant Attorney General and Legal Assistant positions would be required to address the increased workload. However, it is anticipated that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed within existing resources.  The Office of Court Administration indicates that any costs associated with the bill to the court system could be absorbed within existing resources.

The bill would amend the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to waive sovereign immunity for the state related to a breach of contract for engineering, architectural, or construction services or for materials related to those professional services. 

The Office of the Attorney General indicates that additional lawsuits could arise against the state upon enactment of the bill. 

The OAG estimates that an additional 5.5 Assistant Attorney General and Legal Assistant positions would be required to address the increased workload. However, it is anticipated that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed within existing resources. 

The Office of Court Administration indicates that any costs associated with the bill to the court system could be absorbed within existing resources.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 302 Office of the Attorney General, 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

302 Office of the Attorney General, 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

LBB Staff: UP, AG, JM, CL, EP, JP

 UP, AG, JM, CL, EP, JP