Texas House Bill HB891

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the intercollegiate athletics fee at Prairie View A&M University; authorizing an increase in the fee.

Impact

The enactment of HB891 will impact the financial obligations of students at Prairie View A&M University, allowing the university to generate additional revenue for its athletics programs. By enabling students to vote on the fee increase, the bill ensures that those directly affected have a say in the decision-making process, promoting a sense of ownership among the student body. However, it also raises the concern of potential financial burden on students if the fee is increased significantly over time.

Summary

House Bill 891 proposes changes regarding the intercollegiate athletics fee imposed on students at Prairie View A&M University. The bill allows for an increase in this fee to a maximum of $12.60 per semester credit hour from the previous limit of $10. This increase can occur from one academic year to the next upon approval through a majority vote during a general student election or through a majority vote of the legislative body of the student government, provided the increase does not exceed five percent. The bill repeals a section of the Education Code that previously limited the annual increment of this fee, thus simplifying the process for future increases.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB891 reflects a generally supportive view among university administrators and athletic program advocates, who see the fee increase as a necessary measure to enhance the university's athletic facilities and competitiveness. Conversely, some students and advocacy groups express caution regarding the potential financial implications of increased fees, illustrating a divide between the administration's priorities and student concerns over affordability.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include debates over student financial burdens and the degree of control students should have over increases in fees that directly impact their tuition. While supporters argue that the bill is a step towards improving the university's athletic programs and pride, opponents caution against escalating costs that may deter potential students or increase financial strain on current students.