Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB975

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the requirements for obtaining an emergency medical services provider license.

Impact

The implications of HB 975 on state law are significant. By instituting a requirement for local approval before granting EMS provider licenses, the bill seeks to enhance the coordination of emergency services in different jurisdictions. This approach ensures that no community faces an overwhelming number of providers, which could lead to competition that compromises service quality. Moreover, the bill is designed to address the shortage of EMS providers in specific areas, promoting better access to emergency care for residents.

Summary

House Bill 975 aims to amend requirements for obtaining a license for emergency medical services (EMS) providers in Texas. The bill introduces a new requirement for applicants to secure a 'certificate of local need and necessity' from both the county commissioner's court and municipal governing bodies before being licensed. This certificate ensures that any new EMS provider does not adversely affect existing services and addresses provider shortages effectively. These amendments are directed towards improving the safety and efficiency of emergency medical services across the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 975 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who believe that the new measures will streamline the licensing process and ultimately improve emergency response services. However, concerns have been raised about the potential bureaucratic hurdles this local requirement might create, possibly deterring new providers from entering the market and thus exacerbating shortages in some regions.

Contention

Notable points of contention center on the balance between local control and the necessity of ensuring that all areas have adequate emergency medical coverage. Critics worry that local governments might obstruct the entry of new EMS providers for competitive reasons rather than the intended purpose of public safety. This tension reflects a broader debate about regulatory measures that impact public health and emergency services, and stakeholders are divided on how best to achieve a balance that ensures both quality and accessibility of emergency medical care.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX HB4611

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of the health and human services laws governing the Health and Human Services Commission, Medicaid, and other social services.

TX HB5117

Relating to variances from Department of State Health Services rules governing the provision of emergency medical services.

TX SB1588

Relating to variances from Department of State Health Services rules governing the provision of emergency medical services.

TX HB3467

Relating to emergency medical services personnel and coverage by certain health benefit plans for treatment by emergency medical services personnel.

TX SB2476

Relating to consumer protections against certain medical and health care billing by emergency medical services providers.

TX SB121

Relating to authorizing the possession, use, cultivation, distribution, delivery, sale, and research of medical cannabis for medical use by patients with certain medical conditions and the licensing of medical cannabis organizations; authorizing fees.

TX SB1624

Relating to guardianships and services for incapacitated persons and to the emergency detention of certain persons with mental illness.

TX SB1629

Relating to the regulation of certain nursing facilities, including licensing requirements and Medicaid participation requirements.

TX HB617

Relating to a pilot project to provide emergency telemedicine medical services and telehealth services in rural areas.

TX SB251

Relating to a pilot project to provide emergency telemedicine medical services and telehealth services in rural areas.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.