Instructing the enrolling clerk of the house to make corrections in H.B. No. 12.
The implications of HCR218 mainly revolve around the administrative and procedural aspects of the legislative process. By ensuring that the accompanying H.B. No. 12 is correctly worded, this resolution prevents potential legal ambiguities or misunderstandings that could arise from the technical errors. The resolution demonstrates the importance of maintaining precise language in legislative documents, which can have further implications on how laws are interpreted and enforced once enacted.
HCR218 is a concurrent resolution that instructs the enrolling clerk of the Texas House of Representatives to correct certain technical errors in House Bill No. 12. Specifically, the resolution addresses two issues in the language of the bill—adding 'for the purpose of a salary supplement' in a line and correcting the word 'identity' to 'identify'. These changes are procedural in nature, ensuring that the final text is accurate before the bill is officially enrolled and sent for further action or promulgation.
General sentiment around HCR218 appears to be neutral as it deals primarily with technical adjustments rather than substantial policy changes. Since the resolution serves to correct minor errors, it did not generate significant debate or contention among lawmakers, leading to a unanimous voting outcome with 144 yeas and no nays during the third reading in the House. This indicates a cooperative effort to maintain legislative integrity.
While HCR218 itself does not present significant points of contention, it indirectly highlights the necessity for diligence within the legislative process to prevent errors that could affect the implementation of laws. Its passage without opposition illustrates a consensus on the importance of precision in legislative language, and it may serve as a reminder of the broader framework and diligence necessary in state governance.