Texas House Bill HJR121

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing a state video lottery system to operate video lottery games at certain horse and greyhound racetracks and providing that federally recognized Indian tribes are not prohibited from conducting games of chance on certain Indian lands.

Impact

The introduction of a state-run video lottery system is expected to generate additional revenue for state governmental programs. By permitting the operation of video lottery games under strict state regulation, the bill sets forth guidelines for the licensing and monitoring of video lottery terminals. This move could lead to enhanced oversight of gaming practices in Texas while potentially increasing state funds that can be allocated to various public services.

Summary

HJR121 proposes a constitutional amendment to authorize the state of Texas to operate a video lottery system at certain horse and greyhound racetracks. The amendment aims to allow the establishment of video lottery games while ensuring federally recognized Indian tribes are not prohibited from conducting games of chance on their lands. This legislative proposal marks a significant shift in the state's gambling landscape, introducing video lottery terminals as a new form of gaming.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding HJR121 have revealed a mix of support and concern among legislators. Proponents argue that the bill would create jobs, boost the economy, and provide much-needed resources for state programs, appealing to the public's interest in expanding gaming options responsibly. Conversely, critics worry about the implications of introducing more gambling venues, fearing it could lead to increased addiction rates and exacerbate social issues related to gambling.

Contention

Key points of contention include the regulation and control of the proposed video lottery system, particularly concerning how it will intersect with existing gaming laws and the authority of local governments. There are concerns that local municipalities could find their power diminished in regulating gaming activities as state oversight increases, sparking a debate about local control versus state authority in gambling regulations. Additionally, the amendment leaves room for further legislative interpretation regarding Indian gaming rights, which may lead to complex negotiations in the future.