Texas House Bill HJR27

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

• Filed: 11/12/12

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing local option elections to legalize or prohibit the operation of eight-liners.

Impact

The amendment would have significant implications for state laws governing gambling. If passed, it would grant local governments the authority to make decisions tailored to their communities’ preferences regarding the operation of eight-liners. This shift might lead to increased local autonomy in regulatory matters concerning gaming, potentially leading to a more varied landscape of gambling laws across different parts of Texas. Moreover, the proposal allows the legislature to impose a fee on these devices, which could impact local revenue streams.

Summary

HJR27 proposes a constitutional amendment that would allow local option elections in Texas to decide whether to legalize or prohibit the operation of eight-liners, a type of gaming device. The amendment seeks to amend Section 47 of Article III of the Texas Constitution, which currently prohibits lotteries and other gift enterprises except for those specifically authorized. Under the proposed amendments, the legislature would be empowered to regulate eight-liners and similarly categorized devices, establishing a framework for local governments to hold elections on their legality within their jurisdictions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR27 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that local option elections will empower communities to make their own choices regarding gambling, reflecting the desires of their constituents. They cite potential benefits, such as increased local revenue through regulation and taxation of eight-liners. Conversely, opponents express concerns about expanding gambling operations and the possible negative social consequences that may arise, such as addiction and increased crime rates. This divide reflects broader societal views on gambling and local governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions around HJR27 focus on the balance of state versus local control over gambling regulations. Critics of the bill often question whether allowing local option elections will lead to a patchwork of gambling laws that could confuse residents and businesses. Furthermore, some legislators might be concerned about the moral implications of expanding gambling access, alongside fears of a potential increase in gambling-related issues at the community level. As such, this bill highlights ongoing debates regarding regulatory authority and the societal impacts of gambling.