Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention to propose an amendment to the United States Constitution to require the approval of a majority of the state legislatures before Congress may increase the federal debt.
Impact
If enacted, the amendment proposed by HJR55 would fundamentally shift the balance of power regarding federal debt decisions, necessitating the involvement of state legislatures. This could alter how federal financial policies are shaped and could lead to more stringent controls on federal borrowing. The requirement for state approval could theoretically lead to a more cautious approach to federal spending, as any attempt to increase the debt would need to garner support from a majority of state legislatures.
Summary
HJR55 is a joint resolution from the Texas Legislature applying to Congress to call a convention in accordance with Article V of the United States Constitution. The resolution seeks to propose an amendment that would require the approval of a majority of state legislatures before Congress can increase the federal debt. This legislative action reflects a significant concern among certain lawmakers regarding federal fiscal policy and its implications for state governance.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HJR55 appears to be supportive among majority faction lawmakers who view it as a necessary safeguard against what they perceive as irresponsible federal spending. However, there are also voices of concern among opponents who argue that this could lead to a gridlock on necessary funding and may weaken the federal government's ability to respond to financial crises effectively. This divide illustrates a broader debate over state rights versus federal authority.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the potential repercussions of such a constitutional amendment. Critics worry that requiring state approval for federal debt increases could hinder essential government functions during emergencies, potentially leading to significant adverse economic consequences. Furthermore, there is concern about the feasibility of coordinating among states to reach a majority approval, which may result in inconsistencies and challenges in governance.
Rescinding the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Rescinding the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Extending the deadline for the automatic rescission of certain applications made by the Texas Legislature to the United States Congress to call a national convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for proposing any amendment to that constitution.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to require that future constitutional amendments become effective only if approved by a majority of the voters in at least three-fourths of the counties of the state.
Proposing a constitutional amendment establishing the Texas Redistricting Commission to redistrict the Texas Legislature and Texas congressional districts and revising procedures for redistricting.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.