Texas House Bill HR2857

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Commending the Sunset Advisory Commission staff members on the Texas Board of Professional Engineers sunset team.

Impact

The resolution emphasizes the importance of the work done by the Sunset Advisory Commission staff in maintaining the operational efficiency and accountability of state government. By regularly reviewing state agencies, the Commission plays a critical role in ensuring that these entities operate effectively and provide value to taxpayers. This ongoing review process assists in enhancing the performance of the Texas Board of Professional Engineers and supports the overall goal of efficient public administration throughout the state.

Summary

HR2857 is a resolution commending the staff members of the Sunset Advisory Commission who contributed significantly to the consideration of Senate Bill 204, related to the Texas Board of Professional Engineers. This recognition highlights the vital work of the Sunset Advisory Commission, which was established in 1977 to periodically review the policies, operations, and programs of Texas government agencies. The main goal of the Commission is to identify and eliminate waste, duplication, and inefficiencies while assessing the ongoing need for each agency and suggesting innovative improvements.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HR2857 seems to be positive, as it seeks to honor the hard work and dedication of the Sunset Advisory Commission staff. Legislators express appreciation for the professionalism and expertise demonstrated by the team members during their involvement with Senate Bill 204. This resolution fosters goodwill and acknowledges the crucial support these staff members provide in facilitating legislative consideration.

Contention

While the resolution focuses on commendation, it reflects broader discussions about the effectiveness and necessity of state agency reviews. The praise for the staff underscores their role in seeking improvements within government operations, potentially minimizing future contention over efficiency and administrative effectiveness. However, it also raises questions about the balance between oversight and agency independence, which may resonate with some stakeholders advocating for more substantial reforms.