Texas Senate Bill SB1064

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 208; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

The bill's implementation is expected to significantly impact state laws regarding the creation and authority of municipal utility districts in Texas. It outlines procedures for electing a board of directors and emphasizes compliance with local ordinances and construction standards when undertaking projects, such as road construction. Moreover, it ensures that these districts can provide essential services to residents while adhering to both state and local regulations. The fiscal implications regarding tax levies and bond issuances will directly influence funding for infrastructure improvements within the district.

Summary

SB1064 relates to the establishment of the Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 208. This legislative effort aims to provide the district with the authority to impose taxes and issue bonds necessary for funding its operations and projects. One noteworthy aspect of this bill is the district's power to levy taxes for operational expenses and road projects. However, following a two-thirds majority vote from the legislature, there is a clause that restricts the district from exercising the power of eminent domain without special provisions. This highlights an effort to balance the district's powers with the rights of the property owners within its boundary.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB1064 is the restriction on eminent domain powers. The limitations on this power may generate discussion among local communities and stakeholders, particularly those who are concerned about the potential impacts on property rights. Additionally, the ability of the district to impose taxes may raise questions about the financial obligations placed on residents in the district and the transparency surrounding the use of tax revenues for public benefit. As such, the bill reflects a discussion on the balance of local governance capabilities against the risks of overreach into individual property rights.