Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1308 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 14, 2013      TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1308 by Davis (Relating to auditing and monitoring of performance under contracts for state-adopted assessment instruments administered to public school students.), As Engrossed    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would require the Texas Education Agency (TEA) to develop a comprehensive methodology for auditing and monitoring performance for contracts to provide services to develop or administer assessment instruments. The bill would require TEA to ensure that all such new and renewed contracts for services related to assessment instruments include provisions for compliance reviews to monitor vendor performance.  The TEA reports that the provisions of the bill would have no significant fiscal impact on the agency, as TEA currently has a comprehensive auditing and monitoring methodology in place for vendors providing assessment instrument services. The TEA would be required to adopt this methodology in commissioner rule.  Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:701 Central Education Agency   LBB Staff:  UP, JBi, JSc    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 14, 2013





  TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1308 by Davis (Relating to auditing and monitoring of performance under contracts for state-adopted assessment instruments administered to public school students.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1308 by Davis (Relating to auditing and monitoring of performance under contracts for state-adopted assessment instruments administered to public school students.), As Engrossed

 Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education 

 Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB1308 by Davis (Relating to auditing and monitoring of performance under contracts for state-adopted assessment instruments administered to public school students.), As Engrossed

SB1308 by Davis (Relating to auditing and monitoring of performance under contracts for state-adopted assessment instruments administered to public school students.), As Engrossed



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would require the Texas Education Agency (TEA) to develop a comprehensive methodology for auditing and monitoring performance for contracts to provide services to develop or administer assessment instruments. The bill would require TEA to ensure that all such new and renewed contracts for services related to assessment instruments include provisions for compliance reviews to monitor vendor performance.  The TEA reports that the provisions of the bill would have no significant fiscal impact on the agency, as TEA currently has a comprehensive auditing and monitoring methodology in place for vendors providing assessment instrument services. The TEA would be required to adopt this methodology in commissioner rule. 

The bill would require the Texas Education Agency (TEA) to develop a comprehensive methodology for auditing and monitoring performance for contracts to provide services to develop or administer assessment instruments. The bill would require TEA to ensure that all such new and renewed contracts for services related to assessment instruments include provisions for compliance reviews to monitor vendor performance.  The TEA reports that the provisions of the bill would have no significant fiscal impact on the agency, as TEA currently has a comprehensive auditing and monitoring methodology in place for vendors providing assessment instrument services. The TEA would be required to adopt this methodology in commissioner rule. 

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency

701 Central Education Agency

LBB Staff: UP, JBi, JSc

 UP, JBi, JSc