Texas Senate Bill SB1432

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the punishment for violating certain rules or permit terms under a permit to trap, transport, and transplant certain animals.

Impact

This change means that individuals who fail to comply with reporting requirements as stipulated in their permits will face lesser penalties, which supporters argue could encourage better compliance with rules that contribute to wildlife conservation and management. In tandem, it aims to clarify the legal consequences tied to such actions, potentially leading to improved regulatory enforcement and wildlife protection practices across the state. The differentiation in misdemeanors is intended to reflect the severity and potential environmental impact of the violations.

Summary

SB1432, introduced by Senator Hinojosa, addresses the punishments associated with violating rules or permit terms concerning the trapping, transportation, and transplantation of certain animals in Texas. The bill proposes amendments to Section 43.062 of the Parks and Wildlife Code, altering the classification of misdemeanors related to such violations. Specifically, the legislation stipulates that violating any provision of this subchapter typically constitutes a Class B misdemeanor, while specific reporting requirement violations would result in a lesser Class C misdemeanor charge.

Contention

While the bill aims to enhance the management of wildlife and promote responsible practices in trapping and transplanting animals, there could be points of contention related to the perceived leniency of Class C misdemeanors. Critics might argue that reducing penalties could lead to less accountability, potentially harming wildlife conservation efforts. However, proponents believe that adjusting penalties will reduce the burden on the legal system while maintaining necessary regulatory oversight.

Voting_history

SB1432 successfully passed the House with a unanimous vote on May 17, 2013, indicating strong bipartisan support for the bill. This legislative backing suggests a consensus on the importance of wildlife management and regulatory clarity, which could translate into effective on-ground practices in the future.