Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1477

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to flexibility in the administration of the Medicaid program, a block grant funding approach to Medicaid expansion, and the establishment of a health benefit exchange tailored to the needs of the state.

Impact

The legislation would enable Texas to design a block grant funding approach to expand Medicaid services. This would not only change the structure of how Medicaid is administered but may also create incentives for private health insurance by allowing the state to provide premium assistance for participants. Consequently, the state's reliance on federal guidelines could diminish, potentially leading to a unique healthcare model that aligns more closely with local priorities. However, the shift also raises concerns regarding the stability and comprehensiveness of healthcare provision for vulnerable populations.

Summary

SB1477, titled 'Relating to flexibility in the administration of the Medicaid program, a block grant funding approach to Medicaid expansion, and the establishment of a health benefit exchange tailored to the needs of the state,' seeks to provide the state with increased autonomy over its Medicaid program. By negotiating with federal authorities, the bill aims to allow Texas to implement its Medicaid program without the necessity of obtaining federal approval for all changes. This flexibility could lead to different operational models that reflect the specific needs of Texas, particularly in serving the Medicaid expansion population, which encompasses many individuals who would otherwise not qualify for assistance under existing criteria.

Sentiment

Sentiments regarding SB1477 are mixed among stakeholders. Supporters argue that the expanded state control over Medicaid would enhance innovation and efficiency in the healthcare sector, effectively catering to the needs of Texas residents. Conversely, opponents express fears that such changes could undermine essential health safety nets for low-income families and jeopardize the quality of care, particularly if the push towards privatization does not adequately address access and affordability issues.

Contention

A notable point of contention within the discussions around SB1477 stems from its approach to Medicaid expansion and the proposed block grant system. Critics question whether the block grant funding model will be sufficient to cover the needs of all eligible residents and whether the focus on private health benefit coverage might limit access for those dependent on public assistance. Discussions also highlight the potential for varying state policies to create discrepancies in healthcare quality and access across different populations, leading to a significant debate about the balance of state versus federal responsibilities in healthcare management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT SB0257

Medicaid Accounts Amendments

UT HB0247

Child Health Care Coverage Amendments

AR SB518

To Amend The Medicaid Fraud Act And The Medicaid Fraud False Claims Act; And To Update Language And Definitions To Reflect Changes Within The Healthcare System;.

AR SB515

To Amend The Medicaid Fraud Act And The Medicaid Fraud False Claims Act.

UT HB0463

Medicaid Funding Amendments

NJ A3334

Requires Medicaid reimbursement for covered behavioral health services provided by local education agency to student who is eligible Medicaid beneficiary.

NJ S2416

Requires Medicaid reimbursement for covered behavioral health services provided by local education agency to student who is eligible Medicaid beneficiary.

NJ A4049

Provides for presumptive eligibility for home and community-based services and services provided through program of all-inclusive care for the elderly under Medicaid.