Texas Senate Bill SB1600

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to authorizing the county clerk in certain counties to conduct a marriage ceremony and collect a related fee.

Impact

The implementation of SB1600 would amend Section 2.202 of the Family Code to include county clerks as eligible officiants for marriage ceremonies, thereby expanding the authority of clerks in larger counties. Additionally, a fee of $25 will be charged for conducting these ceremonies, which is intended to support charitable organizations that work with children and victims of family violence. This introduces a new local revenue stream while addressing community needs, making it a dual-purpose legislation.

Summary

SB1600 seeks to modify the Texas Family Code by authorizing county clerks in certain populous counties to conduct marriage ceremonies and charge a related fee. Specifically, the bill allows the county clerks to officiate weddings in counties with a population of 1.7 million or more. This change aims to streamline the process for couples seeking to marry by providing an additional option for officiation at a local level where the demand for such services may be higher.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment regarding SB1600 appears to be supportive among specific stakeholder groups, particularly those advocating for increased access to marriage ceremonies and local governance. Proponents argue that allowing county clerks to conduct ceremonies demystifies and simplifies the marriage process, especially in densely populated areas. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the appropriateness of county clerks conducting ceremonies, reflecting a more traditional view that marriage officiation should remain solely within the realm of religious leaders or judges.

Contention

Notable contention around the bill may stem from potential debates about the role of county officials in performing marriage ceremonies. Skeptics of SB1600 might argue that this represents a departure from traditional marriage officiation practices, which are usually reserved for religious or judicial figures. This legislative change raises questions about the nature of legal authority versus religious or cultural practices surrounding marriage, as well as the capacity and qualifications of county clerks to effectively fulfill this role.