Texas Senate Bill SB1663

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to certain water districts that do not provide water and sanitary sewer service to certain users in the districts' territory.

Impact

The implication of SB1663 on state laws is significant, promoting accountability among water districts and establishing clearer expectations for service provision and financial arrangements. The bill seeks to prevent water districts from remaining inactive in their provision of essential services, thereby ensuring that all citizens have access to necessary utilities. Notably, this may also affect the budgetary allocations and operational strategies of municipalities tasked with providing these services if they are to receive compensatory payments from the districts.

Summary

SB1663 aims to amend sections of the Local Government Code regarding water districts that do not provide water and sanitary sewer services within a specified timeline. The bill stipulates that any district created before September 1, 1997, must either provide these essential services to all household users or, in cases where another municipality provides such services, they must make periodic financial payments to that municipality or governmental agency. This change is intended to ensure that water districts fulfill their obligations to provide utility services or contribute financially to those who do.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1663 has been largely focused on improving service delivery and accountability. Supporters argue that the bill is a step towards ensuring that all residents receive the necessary services from their local governments, thereby increasing the efficiency of water districts. However, concerns have been raised about the implications of financial burdens it may place on water districts and the municipalities serving them.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the timing set for compliance by the districts, as some stakeholders argue that it may not be feasible for all districts to provide services within the specified period due to financial and operational constraints. Furthermore, the mechanism for calculating payments to municipalities may lead to disputes about what constitutes reasonable maintenance costs, complicating relationships between water districts and municipal governments. The bill underscores the tension between regulatory compliance and the financial health of smaller water districts.