Texas Senate Bill SB1729

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to an agreement between the Department of Public Safety and a county for the provision of renewal and duplicate driver's license and other identification certificate services; authorizing a fee.

Impact

This legislation is expected to enhance accessibility for residents in both smaller and larger counties by decentralizing the process of obtaining or renewing driver's licenses and IDs. It allows counties to take a hands-on approach in providing these essential services, which could significantly reduce wait times and improve service delivery. Additionally, the bill authorizes counties to collect a fee of up to $5 for each transaction handled under this program, providing a potential new revenue stream for local governments.

Context

Lastly, the implementation of this bill is contingent upon receiving a two-thirds majority vote from both houses of the legislature, which underscores the importance of bipartisan support for the success of such initiatives. The timing of the bill's take-effect clause, either immediately upon passing or on a specified date, also reflects the urgency placed on improving identification services in Texas.

Summary

SB1729 addresses the process of providing renewal and duplicate driver's license and identification certificate services through agreements between the Department of Public Safety (DPS) and county governments. The bill introduces a pilot program which allows the DPS to enter into agreements with counties of various population sizes to facilitate these services. The participating counties will be tasked with administering certain ministerial functions such as taking photographs and administering basic tests while receiving the necessary equipment and supplies from the DPS.

Contention

While SB1729 aims to streamline the process and improve efficiency, there are notable concerns regarding the consistent quality of service that may vary from county to county. Opponents may argue about the adequacy of training for county staff taking on this responsibility, especially in larger counties where a greater volume of service is expected. Moreover, there could be pushback regarding the new fees that counties can charge, as this could impose additional costs on individuals seeking services.