Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB196

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the Business Tax Advisory Committee.

Impact

The establishment of this committee is seen as a significant move to address concerns around the existing taxation framework affecting businesses in Texas. By systematically studying the business tax's effects, the committee aims to provide insights that could lead to informed policy adjustments, enhancing the economic climate for businesses. This initiative could influence tax reforms, potentially benefiting a wide range of business entities while ensuring equitable tax practices are maintained throughout the state.

Summary

SB196 establishes the Business Tax Advisory Committee, aimed at evaluating the impact of state business taxes on various stakeholders. This committee will consist of members from different segments, including two state representatives, two senators, the state comptroller, and several appointed residents with expertise in business taxation and education. Their primary task is to conduct a biennial study of the business tax imposed in Texas, considering factors such as tax share by industry, economic effects, and comparisons with taxes in other states.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB196 has been generally positive among business groups and some legislators who see it as a proactive measure to reassess and improve the business taxation landscape. However, there remains some apprehension from certain advocates fearing that the committee’s deliberations might not adequately consider local economic conditions or the specific needs of small businesses. Overall, the mood leans towards optimism about potential reforms, though a careful balancing act is necessary.

Contention

A notable point of contention often raised in discussions about SB196 involves the committee's composition and its ability to truly represent the diverse interests of Texas businesses. Critics argue that the appointment process, primarily controlled by the state comptroller and legislative leadership, may lead to a lack of representation for smaller businesses and varying sectors within the state. Ensuring that a broad spectrum of business perspectives is included in the discussions and recommendations will be crucial for the bill's acceptance and effectiveness.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.

MN HC1

A house concurrent resolution relating to the regent nomination joint committee.

AZ HB2443

Campaign finance; contributions limits