Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB271

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to a defense to prosecution for the offense of failing to secure a child in a child passenger safety seat system.

Impact

The implications of SB271 extend to the existing statutes under the Texas Transportation Code, particularly concerning child passenger safety regulations. By repealing Section 545.4121, the bill aims to modify the enforcement of penalties associated with failures to secure children properly in approved seating systems. It is important to note that the change proposed by this bill is applicable only to offenses committed after its effective date, thereby preserving the enforcement of previous laws for past actions, which may provide a sense of legal clarity for parents and guardians.

Summary

SB271 proposes a change to the legal provisions regarding the securing of children in passenger safety seats. Specifically, the bill relates to the creation of a defense to prosecution for the offense of failing to secure a child correctly in such a seat. This legislative action seeks to provide certain legal protections for parents or guardians who may inadvertently fail to follow the existing child passenger safety regulations. The intent behind the bill reflects an understanding of the complexities of compliance with safety regulations in specific situations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB271 appears neutral to positive, although specific community feedback may not have been extensively detailed in the documentation. Legislative champions of the bill likely herald it as a necessary adjustment that addresses practical realities faced by caregivers. Nonetheless, potential opposition may arise around concerns regarding the robustness of child safety provisions and how any defenses might affect the enforcement of child rescues in the case of negligence.

Contention

While SB271 is positioned as a protective measure for caregivers, the bill does raise points of contention among stakeholders. Concerns may emerge regarding its interpretation and the potential for misapplication of the defense clause, which could inadvertently lead to abuses wherein compliance with basic safety measures might not be enforced adequately. Critics of such measures often argue that rather than easing penalties, there should be an emphasis on public education and improving child safety practices to ensure that children are consistently secured in safety seats, fundamentally prioritizing their wellbeing.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.