Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB431

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to eliminating the set-aside of a portion of designated tuition for student financial assistance at public institutions of higher education.

Impact

By eliminating the tuition set-aside, SB431 directly affects the financial assistance landscape for students enrolled in Texas public institutions. This action is expected to streamline financial operations for universities, potentially allowing institutions to utilize those funds elsewhere, such as for general operational costs or improvements in infrastructure. However, it raises concerns about the impact on student aid availability, which could lead to increased barriers for lower-income students seeking higher education.

Summary

SB431 aims to eliminate the requirement for public higher education institutions in Texas to set aside a portion of designated tuition for student financial assistance. This bill repeals the existing subchapter that mandates a 5% set-aside from tuition charges exceeding a certain threshold, effectively removing financial burdens placed on institutions regarding student financial aid funding. The proposed changes are set to take effect from the fall semester of 2013, impacting how funds are allocated for student assistance in public colleges and universities.

Sentiment

Reactions to SB431 appear mixed among legislators and stakeholders. Proponents argue that the measure would reduce unnecessary financial constraints on universities, likely benefiting the institutions' budgetary flexibility. Conversely, critics warn that removing the set-aside might strip essential funding from student financial assistance programs at a time when the cost of higher education is already a looming issue for many students and families in Texas.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB431 focus on the potential long-term implications for student aid accessibility. Opponents of the bill express concerns that without mandated set-asides, students from less affluent backgrounds may face greater difficulties in obtaining sufficient financial support to afford college. This debate encapsulates larger discussions about funding priorities in higher education and the balance between institutional financial health and student affordability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.