Texas Senate Bill SB432

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits of individuals who serve on the appraisal review board of an appraisal district.

Impact

The implementation of SB432 would directly affect the unemployment benefits claim process for members serving on appraisal review boards, governed by the new Section 207.0435 of the Labor Code. According to the bill, any claims for unemployment benefits filed after the effective date of this Act on September 1, 2013, will no longer be processed for those individuals based on their service in these boards. This amendment is intended to streamline and define the scope of who can receive unemployment benefits, thereby potentially reducing the number of claims filed by these public service members.

Summary

SB432 proposes a change to the eligibility criteria for unemployment compensation benefits in Texas, specifically addressing individuals who serve on the appraisal review board of an appraisal district. The bill stipulates that those serving in these positions will not be eligible for unemployment benefits based on their service. This change seeks to clarify the status of board members regarding unemployment benefits, as there may have been ambiguities in the past surrounding their eligibility.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB432 appears to lean towards a more stringent approach to unemployment benefits eligibility, reflecting a belief that individuals in appointed or elected public positions should not claim unemployment benefits from state funds. Proponents may argue that this bill enhances accountability and aligns with the intent that service on such boards should not equate to traditional employment that warrants unemployment assistance. However, there is an undercurrent of concern for the fairness of this treatment, especially for individuals who may take on significant responsibilities without the same job security as private-sector employees.

Contention

Notable contentions may arise regarding the fairness and implications of disqualifying appraisal review board members from unemployment benefits. Critics could argue that serving on such boards is still a form of public service and that members invest time and effort that warrants some level of protection in the event of unemployment. The potential for disparities in how similar public service roles are treated could also fuel debates, especially if the general public perceives the bill as penalizing public service rather than recognizing the contributions of these individuals.