LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 13, 2013 TO: Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee On Business & Commerce FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB614 by Lucio (Relating to an electric utility surcharge to assist owners of certain historic structures with electric bill payments and to promote energy conservation and efficiency.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB614, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2015.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 13, 2013
TO: Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee On Business & Commerce FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB614 by Lucio (Relating to an electric utility surcharge to assist owners of certain historic structures with electric bill payments and to promote energy conservation and efficiency.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
TO: Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee On Business & Commerce
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB614 by Lucio (Relating to an electric utility surcharge to assist owners of certain historic structures with electric bill payments and to promote energy conservation and efficiency.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee On Business & Commerce
Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee On Business & Commerce
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB614 by Lucio (Relating to an electric utility surcharge to assist owners of certain historic structures with electric bill payments and to promote energy conservation and efficiency.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
SB614 by Lucio (Relating to an electric utility surcharge to assist owners of certain historic structures with electric bill payments and to promote energy conservation and efficiency.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB614, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2015.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB614, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2015.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2014 $0 2015 $0 2016 $0 2017 $0 2018 $0
2014 $0
2015 $0
2016 $0
2017 $0
2018 $0
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromHistoric Structure Energy Assistance Probable Savings/(Cost) fromHistoric Structure Energy Assistance Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2013 2014 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0 2015 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0 2016 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0 2017 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0 2018 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromHistoric Structure Energy Assistance Probable Savings/(Cost) fromHistoric Structure Energy Assistance Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2013 2014 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0 2015 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0 2016 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0 2017 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0 2018 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0
2014 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0
2015 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0
2016 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0
2017 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0
2018 $384,000 ($384,000) 1.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Utilities Code relating to energy assistance for historic structures. The bill would establish a Historic Structure Energy Assistance Fund as an account in the General Revenue fund administered by the Public Utility Commission (PUC). The bill would require electric utilities, municipally owned utilties, and electric cooperaties in a county affected by the provisions of the bill to collect a monthly surcharge of 50 cents per customer and remit the collected revenue for deposit to the Historic Structure Energy Assistance Fund. Money in the fund would be available for the purposes of a grant, loan, or other assistance program, established by the PUC, to increase energy efficiency and promote energy conservation in historic structures, and assist owners of historic structures with electric bill payments. The bill would require the PUC to adopt and enforce rules related to the program. Money in the fund would also be available to pay the costs incurred by the PUC related to rulemaking and administering the program and fund. The bill would take effect immediately upon receiving a two-thirds majority vote in both houses; otherwise, the bill would take effect September 1, 2013.
The bill would amend the Utilities Code relating to energy assistance for historic structures. The bill would establish a Historic Structure Energy Assistance Fund as an account in the General Revenue fund administered by the Public Utility Commission (PUC). The bill would require electric utilities, municipally owned utilties, and electric cooperaties in a county affected by the provisions of the bill to collect a monthly surcharge of 50 cents per customer and remit the collected revenue for deposit to the Historic Structure Energy Assistance Fund.
Money in the fund would be available for the purposes of a grant, loan, or other assistance program, established by the PUC, to increase energy efficiency and promote energy conservation in historic structures, and assist owners of historic structures with electric bill payments. The bill would require the PUC to adopt and enforce rules related to the program. Money in the fund would also be available to pay the costs incurred by the PUC related to rulemaking and administering the program and fund.
The bill would take effect immediately upon receiving a two-thirds majority vote in both houses; otherwise, the bill would take effect September 1, 2013.
Methodology
This analysis is based on information provided by the Comptroller of Public Accounts and the PUC. The provisions of the bill would only apply to Cameron County and would affect approximately 64,000 customers. The yearly revenue projection was calculated by multiplying the 64,000 current customers impacted by the bill by the monthly 50 cent surcharge. This $32,000 product was multiplied by 12 months to produce the yearly revenue projection. This analysis does not consider any change in customer population that may occur in Cameron County over the next five years. In order to oversee and administer the assistance program for historic structures required by the provisions of the bill, the PUC anticipates the need for an additional 1.0 full-time equivalent (FTE) at a Grant Administrator II position, with a total salary cost of $60,000. Additional expenses include $3,360 per year in other operating expenses and estimated benefits costs of $17,844 per year. This analysis assumes the salary, benefits, and other operating costs would be paid from the Historic Structure Energy Assistance Fund. Based on information provided by the PUC, this analysis assumes the entire amount of revenue deposited into the Historic Structure Energy Assistance fund, minus administrative costs, would be allocated through the grant, loan, or other assistance program established by the provisions of the bill. This legislation would do one or more of the following: create or recreate a dedicated account in the General Revenue Fund, create or recreate a special or trust fund either with or outside of the Treasury, or create a dedicated revenue source. Legislative policy, implemented as Government Code 403.094, consolidated special funds (except those affected by constitutional, federal, or other restrictions) into the General Revenue Fund as of August 31, 1993, and eliminated all applicable statutory revenue dedications as of August 31, 1995. Each subsequent Legislature has reviewed bills that affect funds consolidation. The fund, account, or revenue dedication included in this bill would be subject to funds consolidation review by the current Legislature.
This analysis is based on information provided by the Comptroller of Public Accounts and the PUC. The provisions of the bill would only apply to Cameron County and would affect approximately 64,000 customers. The yearly revenue projection was calculated by multiplying the 64,000 current customers impacted by the bill by the monthly 50 cent surcharge. This $32,000 product was multiplied by 12 months to produce the yearly revenue projection. This analysis does not consider any change in customer population that may occur in Cameron County over the next five years.
In order to oversee and administer the assistance program for historic structures required by the provisions of the bill, the PUC anticipates the need for an additional 1.0 full-time equivalent (FTE) at a Grant Administrator II position, with a total salary cost of $60,000. Additional expenses include $3,360 per year in other operating expenses and estimated benefits costs of $17,844 per year. This analysis assumes the salary, benefits, and other operating costs would be paid from the Historic Structure Energy Assistance Fund.
Based on information provided by the PUC, this analysis assumes the entire amount of revenue deposited into the Historic Structure Energy Assistance fund, minus administrative costs, would be allocated through the grant, loan, or other assistance program established by the provisions of the bill.
This legislation would do one or more of the following: create or recreate a dedicated account in the General Revenue Fund, create or recreate a special or trust fund either with or outside of the Treasury, or create a dedicated revenue source. Legislative policy, implemented as Government Code 403.094, consolidated special funds (except those affected by constitutional, federal, or other restrictions) into the General Revenue Fund as of August 31, 1993, and eliminated all applicable statutory revenue dedications as of August 31, 1995. Each subsequent Legislature has reviewed bills that affect funds consolidation. The fund, account, or revenue dedication included in this bill would be subject to funds consolidation review by the current Legislature.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 473 Public Utility Commission of Texas
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 473 Public Utility Commission of Texas
LBB Staff: UP, RB, MW, ED, KKR
UP, RB, MW, ED, KKR