Texas Senate Bill SB724

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 133; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.

Impact

The establishment of this district enables the local governing body to address infrastructure needs autonomously. It empowers the district to design, acquire, and maintain local road infrastructures which may alleviate congestion and improve access in the region. The district will have powers akin to those of other Municipal Utility Districts within Texas, and can create a financial framework through bonds and taxes that directly supports the development of much-needed infrastructure. The legislation can significantly influence local government operations by delineating a framework that utilizes both local funds and governmental oversight.

Summary

Senate Bill 724 aims to establish the Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 133 in Texas, which grants the district the authority to issue bonds, levy assessments, impose fees, and collect taxes to finance its operations and projects. The district is designed to serve public purposes, primarily concerning the construction, acquisition, and maintenance of roads and related improvements such as storm drainage. This bill reflects a broader trend in Texas legislation to facilitate local governance and infrastructure development in response to growing populations in certain areas.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB724 include the limited power of eminent domain, as the bill explicitly states that the district cannot utilize this power unless the legislation receives a two-thirds vote from the elected members of both houses. Some fears among local stakeholders may include concerns regarding taxation and increased government oversight, leading to pushback from property owners who might be apprehensive about increased assessments tied to local utility district funding. This limitation showcases a sensitive balance between empowering local governance and safeguarding individual property rights.