Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB798

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to residency requirements for a hunting license.

Impact

If enacted, SB798 would significantly impact state laws by amending existing statutes related to medical assistance programs. By loosening the criteria for eligibility, the bill intends to improve access to healthcare for disabled citizens, thereby enhancing their quality of life and potentially reducing the financial strain on families. Additionally, the legislation reflects a commitment to inclusivity in state healthcare programs, aligning with broader goals of welfare reform and support for marginalized communities.

Summary

SB798 addresses changes to the criteria for eligibility for medical assistance for individuals with disabilities. The bill aims to broaden the eligibility criteria to ensure that a larger number of disabled individuals can access essential healthcare services. The proposal comes in light of concerns regarding the current limitations that have rendered many otherwise qualified individuals ineligible for assistance, subsequently hindering their access to necessary medical care.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB798 tends to be positive among advocates for disability rights and healthcare access. Supporters argue that the proposed changes represent a critical step toward ensuring that disabled individuals receive the medical support they need without unnecessary barriers. Conversely, some critics express concerns over the potential financial implications for the state budget, arguing that expanding eligibility could strain resources that are already limited in state-sponsored programs.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding SB798 include debates over fiscal responsibility and the feasibility of increasing the pool of qualified applicants for assistance. Critics worry that the expanded eligibility criteria might lead to an unsustainable demand for medical services, which could impact funding and lead to longer wait times. Proponents counter that the benefits of improved health outcomes and support for the disabled population far outweigh potential costs, citing studies that show investing in health access can mitigate higher costs associated with untreated medical conditions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.