LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 8, 2013 TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee on Education FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB914 by Lucio (Relating to a behavior improvement plan adopted for certain students with an individualized education program.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would to allow an admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee to determine if a behavior improvement plan is appropriate for a student with an individualized education program (IEP). If the ARD committee determined it was appropriate, the behavior improvement plan would be incorporated into the student's IEP and provided to each of the student's teachers. Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), required revisions to the model IEP could be accomplished with existing agency resources. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:701 Central Education Agency LBB Staff: UP, JBi, JSc
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 8, 2013
TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee on Education FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB914 by Lucio (Relating to a behavior improvement plan adopted for certain students with an individualized education program.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee on Education
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB914 by Lucio (Relating to a behavior improvement plan adopted for certain students with an individualized education program.), As Introduced
Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee on Education
Honorable Dan Patrick, Chair, Senate Committee on Education
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB914 by Lucio (Relating to a behavior improvement plan adopted for certain students with an individualized education program.), As Introduced
SB914 by Lucio (Relating to a behavior improvement plan adopted for certain students with an individualized education program.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would to allow an admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee to determine if a behavior improvement plan is appropriate for a student with an individualized education program (IEP). If the ARD committee determined it was appropriate, the behavior improvement plan would be incorporated into the student's IEP and provided to each of the student's teachers. Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), required revisions to the model IEP could be accomplished with existing agency resources.
The bill would to allow an admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee to determine if a behavior improvement plan is appropriate for a student with an individualized education program (IEP). If the ARD committee determined it was appropriate, the behavior improvement plan would be incorporated into the student's IEP and provided to each of the student's teachers.
Based on the analysis of the Texas Education Agency (TEA), required revisions to the model IEP could be accomplished with existing agency resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency
701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: UP, JBi, JSc
UP, JBi, JSc