Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SJR21

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Sent toSOS
 
Proposed Const. Amend.
 

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment relating to appropriations for the preservation and perpetuation of certain items of historical value; allowing the legislature and state agencies to accept on behalf of the state gifts of items of historical value and contributions to purchase such items.

Impact

If enacted, SJR21 amends Section 39 of Article XVI of the Texas Constitution, explicitly granting the legislature the ability to allocate funds for the preservation of historical items. This change aims to bolster resources available for such endeavors, potentially leading to enhanced cultural projects that resonate with both residents and visitors. The financial support for historic preservation aids museums, public displays, and educational initiatives, which can play a significant role in fostering community pride and education regarding Texas's history.

Summary

SJR21 proposes a constitutional amendment in Texas aimed at enhancing the legislative power to make appropriations for the preservation and perpetuation of items of historical significance. The bill allows the legislature and state agencies to accept gifts and contributions for the purpose of acquiring such items, thereby facilitating the preservation of Texas's rich history. This initiative reflects a broader recognition of the need to maintain and celebrate the state's cultural heritage through tangible artifacts, monuments, and other forms of historical documentation.

Contention

The discussions surrounding SJR21 may involve different perspectives on how public funds should be allocated for historical preservation. Proponents of the bill assert its necessity for safeguarding Texas's heritage, arguing that the state has a responsibility to preserve its history for future generations. However, there may be concerns regarding the appropriateness of using public funds for certain types of historical items or whether the state should prioritize other pressing needs over historical preservation. This tension between cultural investment and fiscal responsibility could be a central point of contention during debates over the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.