Texas House Bill HB13

Texas 2013 - 83rd 2nd C.S.

Caption

Relating to a permit requirement and the payment by a utility of a fee for the use of state highway rights-of-way.

Impact

Should this bill be enacted, it would create a formal requirement for utility companies to pay a fee to the Department of Transportation for the use of highway rights-of-way. This move is intended to alleviate the financial burden on the state by generating funds specifically earmarked for highway upkeep. Some exemptions are included in the bill, indicating that property owners and municipalities would not be required to pay these fees, which could alleviate some concerns from local governments regarding the financial implications of maintaining their utility infrastructure.

Summary

House Bill 13 proposes the establishment of a permit requirement and associated fee for utility companies seeking to use state highway rights-of-way for their facilities. The bill aims to amend the Transportation Code by adding a section that necessitates both governmental and private entities to obtain permits for construction, maintenance, or operation of utility facilities in these areas. The introduced measure is designed to ensure that utilities contribute to the costs associated with the maintenance of state highways.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 13 appears to be cautiously optimistic among proponent stakeholders, especially within regulatory bodies and transportation agencies that may view this as a necessary step towards fiscal responsibility. However, utility companies may express reservations regarding any potential financial burden that permit fees could introduce, which could lead to increased costs for consumers.

Contention

One of the key points of contention revolves around the implications of imposing fees on utility companies and how that might translate to fees for consumers. Additionally, some may argue that requiring permits could delay utility projects and complicate operations for companies operating in the state. Opponents might raise concerns over the overarching necessity of state oversight in areas traditionally managed at the local level, questioning whether such measures might stifle efficiencies in local utility management.