Texas House Bill HB33

Texas 2013 - 83rd 2nd C.S.

Caption

Relating to the reimbursement of state funds used on out-of-state travel by elected officers.

Impact

If implemented, the provisions of HB 33 would strengthen the oversight role of the Texas Ethics Commission in monitoring state-funded travel activities by elected officials. The bill sets clear requirements for reporting travel funded by state resources, which is expected to foster a culture of fiscal responsibility among state officers. The process of requiring reimbursements for travel deemed not related to official state business ensures that public funds are utilized appropriately.

Summary

House Bill 33 focuses on the reimbursement process for state funds utilized by elected officers for out-of-state travel. The bill stipulates that any elected officer using state funds for transportation or security outside Texas must file a disclosure with the Texas Ethics Commission. The disclosure requires specific details about the travel, including dates, locations, costs, purposes, and the use of state-funded personnel. This effort aims to enhance transparency and accountability regarding how taxpayer money is spent on travel for state officials.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 33 appears to be generally positive, particularly among proponents of government accountability and transparency. Supporters believe that enhancing disclosure requirements for travel will help to restore public trust in elected officials. However, some opposition may stem from concerns about a potential bureaucratic burden placed on state officers required to comply with the new reporting and reimbursement requirements.

Contention

While the bill is largely focused on transparency, some opposition could arise from concerns over how strictly the definitions of 'official state business' are interpreted by the Texas Ethics Commission. Members of the legislature may worry about the implications of the disclosure process impacting their ability to conduct necessary travel for their roles effectively. Nonetheless, the primary contention revolves around the balance between accountability and operational efficiency for state officials.