LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 1, 2015 TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1264 by Wu (relating to the preservation of toxicological evidence collected in connection with certain intoxication offenses. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to require any law enforcement agency or crime lab charged with collecting, analyzing, or storing the specimens to retain and preserve the evidence for certain periods of time, depending on certain specified circumstances. A court would be required to determine the applicable retention period. It is assumed any costs associated with implementing the bill could be absorbed within current resources. Local Government Impact There would be costs to units of local governments for the costs to store and catalog toxicological evidence. The costs and the fiscal impact will vary between entities depending on their overall budget, the number of cases, and the length of time storage is required for the evidence. According to the Office of Court Administration, some additional staff time would be required by local courts to produce the required notifications; however, no significant fiscal impact to local courts is anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 213 Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney, 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Commission on Law Enforcement, 644 Juvenile Justice Department LBB Staff: UP, KJo, AI, GDz, KVe, JAW
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 1, 2015
TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1264 by Wu (relating to the preservation of toxicological evidence collected in connection with certain intoxication offenses. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1264 by Wu (relating to the preservation of toxicological evidence collected in connection with certain intoxication offenses. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1264 by Wu (relating to the preservation of toxicological evidence collected in connection with certain intoxication offenses. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
HB1264 by Wu (relating to the preservation of toxicological evidence collected in connection with certain intoxication offenses. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to require any law enforcement agency or crime lab charged with collecting, analyzing, or storing the specimens to retain and preserve the evidence for certain periods of time, depending on certain specified circumstances. A court would be required to determine the applicable retention period. It is assumed any costs associated with implementing the bill could be absorbed within current resources.
Local Government Impact
There would be costs to units of local governments for the costs to store and catalog toxicological evidence. The costs and the fiscal impact will vary between entities depending on their overall budget, the number of cases, and the length of time storage is required for the evidence. According to the Office of Court Administration, some additional staff time would be required by local courts to produce the required notifications; however, no significant fiscal impact to local courts is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 213 Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney, 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Commission on Law Enforcement, 644 Juvenile Justice Department
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 213 Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney, 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Commission on Law Enforcement, 644 Juvenile Justice Department
LBB Staff: UP, KJo, AI, GDz, KVe, JAW
UP, KJo, AI, GDz, KVe, JAW