Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1467

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds for a classroom building at Texas A&M University--Kingsville.

Impact

If enacted, the bill will empower the Texas A&M University System to obtain funds specifically for equipping and enhancing the classroom infrastructure necessary to support STEM education at the Kingsville campus. The financial model proposed involves using revenue generated from tuition and other funds to secure these bonds, which raises questions about long-term financial management within the university system. Additionally, the assurance that revenue pledges cannot be reduced while the bonds are outstanding indicates a strong commitment to safeguarding these funding sources for educational advancement.

Summary

House Bill 1467 aims to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds to finance the construction of a classroom building dedicated to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) at Texas A&M University--Kingsville. The bill specifically allows the board of regents of The Texas A&M University System to utilize an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $93 million in revenue from such bonds. This bill is part of a larger initiative to enhance educational facilities that support STEM programs, which are critical for the workforce in an increasingly technology-driven economy. It reflects a commitment to improving educational infrastructure at public universities in Texas, particularly in crucial fields of study.

Contention

Concerns may arise regarding the implications of financing educational infrastructure through revenue bonds, particularly around the reliance on student tuition charges as a pledge for repayment. Stakeholders will need to consider the potential impact on students if overall tuition costs are affected. Moreover, while the construction of new facilities may improve educational opportunities, critics could argue that such funding mechanisms divert resources from other pressing needs within the state’s education system, such as maintenance of existing facilities or broader educational programs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.