Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1483

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the dispensing of aesthetic pharmaceuticals by physicians and therapeutic optometrists; imposing fees.

Impact

This bill has significant implications for state laws governing healthcare practices. By formalizing the terms under which aesthetic pharmaceuticals may be dispensed, it establishes a safer framework for both patients and providers. With the introduction of fees for dispensing these medications, it sets a financial structure that is aligned with similar laws governing pharmacists. Furthermore, the bill mandates the Texas Medical Board and the Texas Optometry Board to develop relevant rules and establish necessary regulations that will influence how aesthetic care is administered across the state.

Summary

House Bill 1483 seeks to regulate the dispensing of aesthetic pharmaceuticals by licensed physicians and therapeutic optometrists in the state of Texas. The bill introduces provisions that allow these practitioners to dispense specific aesthetic drugs, ensuring they can do so without the need for a separate pharmacy license, provided they follow strict recordkeeping and labeling protocols. The legislation aims to support practitioners in offering accessible patient care while maintaining compliance with existing laws and regulations surrounding pharmaceutical dispensation.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1483 reflects a generally positive view among proponents who argue that it enhances the autonomy of healthcare providers by allowing them to dispense medications directly. Supporters highlight that this will improve patient access to treatments without the need for pharmacy intervention. However, there may be caution expressed by some stakeholders who worry about the potential for misuse or over-prescribing of aesthetic medications. Overall, the discourse around the bill demonstrates a balance between improving patient care and ensuring stringent oversight.

Contention

Notable points of contention center around the specifics of how aesthetic pharmaceuticals are defined and the implications of allowing practitioners other than pharmacists to dispense these drugs. Concerns related to patient safety and the potential for unnecessary treatments being prescribed linger among some advocacy groups and healthcare professionals. There is also an anticipated need for clear guidelines from the Texas Medical Board and Texas Optometry Board that will govern the practice to ensure that aesthetic pharmaceuticals are used responsibly and in alignment with the medical standards.

Companion Bills

TX SB588

Similar Relating to the dispensing of aesthetic pharmaceuticals by physicians and therapeutic optometrists; imposing fees.

Similar Bills

TX SB1081

Relating to the dispensing of pharmaceuticals with an aesthetic purpose by physicians and therapeutic optometrists.

TX HB713

Relating to the dispensing of pharmaceuticals with an aesthetic purpose by physicians and therapeutic optometrists.

TX SB588

Relating to the dispensing of aesthetic pharmaceuticals by physicians and therapeutic optometrists; imposing fees.

TX SB227

Relating to the dispensing of aesthetic pharmaceuticals by physicians and therapeutic optometrists; imposing fees.

LA HB1180

Provides for a feasibility study concerning a pharmaceutical and therapeutics committee for Medicaid managed care

CA AB407

Optometry: assistants and scope of practice.

CA AB1802

State Board of Optometry: optometrists: dispensing opticians.

CA SB762

Optometry: administration of immunizations.