LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION Revision 2 April 17, 2015 TO: Honorable John Kuempel, Chair, House Committee on General Investigating & Ethics FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1690 by King, Phil (Relating to the prosecution of offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Government Code, to direct an officer of the Texas Rangers to conduct an investigation of a complaint alleging an offense against public administration, including ethics offenses, as defined in the bill. The officer would refer alleged offenses by state officers or state employees appearing to rise to the level of criminal misconduct to the appropriate prosecutor of the county in which venue is proper, as defined by the bill. In the event a local prosecutors must be recused from a case, the presiding judges of the administrative judicial regions would select another prosecutor from within the same administrative judicial region. State agencies and local law enforcement would be required to assist in the investigation, as appropriate. The District Attorney's Office of Travis County reports that in fiscal year 2013, out of 193 complaints received, 8 included allegations amounting to offenses against public administration as defined in the bill. Accordingly, in this analysis it is assumed an officer of the Texas Rangers who has the authority to investigate offenses against public administration under bill provisions would investigate an estimated 8 complaints each fiscal year. Some of these investigations may result in indictment. The Department of Public Safety indicates it could reasonably absorb any additional duties associated with bill provisions within existing resources. The Office of Court Administration indicates bill provisions would not represent a significant fiscal implication to the statewide court system. From time to time, there would be costs for services of an investigator other than an officer of the Texas Rangers, should that office have a conflict of interest. The bill would take effect September 1, 2015. Local Government Impact The Office of Court Administration indicates that while there may be some costs for travel associated with appointed prosecutors in cases where the local prosecutor is recused, no significant fiscal implication to local courts is anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 405 Department of Public Safety, 356 Texas Ethics Commission LBB Staff: UP, FR, MW, TB, SD
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
Revision 2
April 17, 2015
Revision 2
Revision 2
TO: Honorable John Kuempel, Chair, House Committee on General Investigating & Ethics FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1690 by King, Phil (Relating to the prosecution of offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
TO: Honorable John Kuempel, Chair, House Committee on General Investigating & Ethics
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1690 by King, Phil (Relating to the prosecution of offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Honorable John Kuempel, Chair, House Committee on General Investigating & Ethics
Honorable John Kuempel, Chair, House Committee on General Investigating & Ethics
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1690 by King, Phil (Relating to the prosecution of offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
HB1690 by King, Phil (Relating to the prosecution of offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Government Code, to direct an officer of the Texas Rangers to conduct an investigation of a complaint alleging an offense against public administration, including ethics offenses, as defined in the bill. The officer would refer alleged offenses by state officers or state employees appearing to rise to the level of criminal misconduct to the appropriate prosecutor of the county in which venue is proper, as defined by the bill. In the event a local prosecutors must be recused from a case, the presiding judges of the administrative judicial regions would select another prosecutor from within the same administrative judicial region. State agencies and local law enforcement would be required to assist in the investigation, as appropriate. The District Attorney's Office of Travis County reports that in fiscal year 2013, out of 193 complaints received, 8 included allegations amounting to offenses against public administration as defined in the bill. Accordingly, in this analysis it is assumed an officer of the Texas Rangers who has the authority to investigate offenses against public administration under bill provisions would investigate an estimated 8 complaints each fiscal year. Some of these investigations may result in indictment. The Department of Public Safety indicates it could reasonably absorb any additional duties associated with bill provisions within existing resources. The Office of Court Administration indicates bill provisions would not represent a significant fiscal implication to the statewide court system. From time to time, there would be costs for services of an investigator other than an officer of the Texas Rangers, should that office have a conflict of interest. The bill would take effect September 1, 2015.
The District Attorney's Office of Travis County reports that in fiscal year 2013, out of 193 complaints received, 8 included allegations amounting to offenses against public administration as defined in the bill. Accordingly, in this analysis it is assumed an officer of the Texas Rangers who has the authority to investigate offenses against public administration under bill provisions would investigate an estimated 8 complaints each fiscal year. Some of these investigations may result in indictment. The Department of Public Safety indicates it could reasonably absorb any additional duties associated with bill provisions within existing resources. The Office of Court Administration indicates bill provisions would not represent a significant fiscal implication to the statewide court system. From time to time, there would be costs for services of an investigator other than an officer of the Texas Rangers, should that office have a conflict of interest.
The bill would take effect September 1, 2015.
Local Government Impact
The Office of Court Administration indicates that while there may be some costs for travel associated with appointed prosecutors in cases where the local prosecutor is recused, no significant fiscal implication to local courts is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 405 Department of Public Safety, 356 Texas Ethics Commission
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 405 Department of Public Safety, 356 Texas Ethics Commission
LBB Staff: UP, FR, MW, TB, SD
UP, FR, MW, TB, SD