Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1690

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 

Caption

Relating to the investigation and prosecution of offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1690 represents a significant shift in how the state of Texas handles allegations of misconduct among state officials. The creation of the Public Integrity Unit empowers law enforcement to investigate and prosecute such offenses more efficiently and equitably. The state's laws regarding the investigation and prosecution of public office misconduct will now explicitly include provisions for the oversight of substantial ethical violations, marking an important step in promoting integrity in public service.

Summary

House Bill 1690 establishes a Public Integrity Unit within the Texas Rangers to address investigations and prosecutions related to offenses against public administration, specifically targeting ethics offenses by state officials and employees. The bill amends Chapter 411 of the Government Code to define 'offenses against public administration,' extending the authority of state agencies to address ethical conduct and improper actions related to public office. By formalizing this unit, the bill aims to enhance transparency and accountability within state governance.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 1690 is largely positive, particularly among proponents who view it as a necessary measure for maintaining ethical governance. Supporters argue that the bill will provide the essential infrastructure for holding public officials accountable and will serve as a deterrent to wrongdoing. However, some concerns have been raised about the potential for misuse of the unit's authority and how it may impact current investigations or lead to political motivations. Nonetheless, the passage of the bill reflects a collective desire to improve public trust in government.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions around the balancing act between rigorous oversight and the preservation of due process rights for officials under investigation. The bill will also require cooperation from both state agencies and local law enforcement, raising questions about resource allocation and the potential for conflicts of interest. There are apprehensions that the politicization of ethics investigations may emerge, leading to challenges in maintaining the integrity of the prosecutorial process.

Companion Bills

TX SB10

Similar Relating to the prosecution of offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses.

Previously Filed As

TX HB2419

Relating to the relationship between the Estates Code and the former Texas Probate Code.

TX HB3327

Relating to a grant program to fund domestic violence high risk teams.

TX HB23

Relating to disclosure of certain relationships with local government officers and vendors; creating criminal offenses.

Similar Bills

TX SB10

Relating to the prosecution of offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses.

TX HB3543

Relating to the establishment of the Public Integrity Prosecutions Committee and the Office of Public Integrity Prosecutions for the prosecution of offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses, offenses involving insurance fraud, and offenses involving motor fuels tax and to the appointment of committee members and the appointment and compensation of the prosecutor.

NJ S3637

Establishes Office of Inspector General for Prosecutorial Review in but not of DLPS.

TX HB2222

Relating to the creation of a public integrity unit to prosecute offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses, offenses involving insurance fraud, and offenses involving motor fuels tax.

TX HB1717

Relating to the state's continuing duty to disclose exculpatory, impeachment, or mitigating evidence in a criminal case and prohibited retaliation against local assistant prosecutors for discharging that duty.

TX SB1903

Relating to the state's continuing duty to disclose exculpatory, impeachment, or mitigating evidence in a criminal case and prohibited retaliation against local assistant prosecutors for discharging that duty.

TX HB311

Relating to the state's continuing duty to disclose exculpatory, impeachment, or mitigating evidence in a criminal case and prohibited retaliation against local assistant prosecutors for discharging that duty.

PA HB1186

In general provisions relating to criminal proceedings, establishing the Adjunct Prosecutor Division within the Office of Attorney General; providing for its powers and duties; and establishing the Adjunct Prosecutor Division Restricted Account.