Texas House Bill HB1772

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to the authority of the governing body of a taxing unit to exempt from ad valorem taxation mineral interests owned by nonprofit corporations organized for the exclusive purpose of generating income for certain charitable nonprofit corporations through the ownership, lease, and management of real property.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1772 could significantly alter the fiscal landscape for certain nonprofit corporations involved in property management and charitable endeavors. By exempting mineral interests from property taxes, these organizations may be better positioned to allocate their resources toward fulfilling their charitable missions, potentially increasing their operational capabilities. However, this tax exemption could reduce the tax base for local government entities reliant on such revenues, leading to implications for public funding and services in affected areas.

Summary

House Bill 1772 pertains to the authorization of tax exemptions for mineral interests owned by nonprofit corporations in Texas. Specifically, it allows these nonprofit entities to exempt their mineral interests from ad valorem taxation, provided they meet certain requirements. These nonprofits must be organized primarily to generate income for a specified charitable organization through the management of real property, including mineral interests, without charging fees for services or accepting governmental funding. This act amends the Tax Code to establish these provisions clearly and requires exemption adoption by taxing units in accordance with established procedures.

Contention

The passage of HB 1772 may provoke debate among state legislators and local officials regarding the balance between supporting charitable organizations and maintaining adequate fiscal resources for communities. Proponents of the bill argue that it encourages charitable work by reducing the financial burdens on nonprofits, enabling them to serve their communities more effectively. Conversely, opponents may argue that such exemptions contribute to a diminishing tax base, shifting the fiscal responsibility to other taxpayers and possibly undermining local funding for essential services.