Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2221 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 20, 2015      TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2221 by Huberty (Relating to the procedures for municipal annexations.), As Introduced    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Local Government Code to prohibit municipalities from entering into strategic partnerships for limited purpose annexation and annexing an area for limited purposes. The bill prescribes the process and requirements for a municipality to conduct full purpose annexations of various areas. Depending on the area to be annexed, a municipality would be required to: collect signatures for a petition, hold public hearings, inform and publish information on public hearings, and conduct an election to approve an annexation.  The bill would repeal Sections of the Local Government Code, and Special District Local Laws Code.The bill has no direct fiscal implications for the FSP or the operations of the TEA. Local Government Impact The costs to local governments would depend on which municipality engaged in the annexation proceedings and the area to be annexed by the municipality. Depending on the area of annexation, there could be costs associated with holding public hearings, collecting signatures and petitions, and conducting elections.  Texas Municipal League reported the bill would impact the ability of a municipality to expand their tax base, which would result in a significant fiscal impact on the municipality.      Source Agencies:701 Central Education Agency   LBB Staff:  UP, SZ, SD, EK, JBi    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 20, 2015





  TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2221 by Huberty (Relating to the procedures for municipal annexations.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2221 by Huberty (Relating to the procedures for municipal annexations.), As Introduced

 Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management 

 Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2221 by Huberty (Relating to the procedures for municipal annexations.), As Introduced

HB2221 by Huberty (Relating to the procedures for municipal annexations.), As Introduced



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Local Government Code to prohibit municipalities from entering into strategic partnerships for limited purpose annexation and annexing an area for limited purposes. The bill prescribes the process and requirements for a municipality to conduct full purpose annexations of various areas. Depending on the area to be annexed, a municipality would be required to: collect signatures for a petition, hold public hearings, inform and publish information on public hearings, and conduct an election to approve an annexation.  The bill would repeal Sections of the Local Government Code, and Special District Local Laws Code.The bill has no direct fiscal implications for the FSP or the operations of the TEA.

Local Government Impact

The costs to local governments would depend on which municipality engaged in the annexation proceedings and the area to be annexed by the municipality. Depending on the area of annexation, there could be costs associated with holding public hearings, collecting signatures and petitions, and conducting elections.  Texas Municipal League reported the bill would impact the ability of a municipality to expand their tax base, which would result in a significant fiscal impact on the municipality.  

Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency

701 Central Education Agency

LBB Staff: UP, SZ, SD, EK, JBi

 UP, SZ, SD, EK, JBi